• Kyden Fumofly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    I don’t know what they are thinking, but i protect my ID data more than i protect my credit card data.

  • MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago

    No one needs the internet outside of work. The moment I’m forced to show my ID or get my face scanned, I’m done for good.

  • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This is why the Dark-web exists.

    • Tor
    • I2P
    • Yggdrasil
    • LokiNet
    • FreeNet
    • ZeroNet
    • GNUnet (In the distant future)

    Did I miss anything ?

  • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yes, the EU with their draconian and dystopian plans just go over our heads and do it.
    All quiet and sneaky, no articles in the sold out press, only small specific outlets or sites that investigate privacy or tech.

        • AlolanYoda@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Really? I haven’t really used Tor but I can’t find anything about that. What happened?

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Current US administration stopped funding it as part of their slide towards corporate-driven dystopia, I believe. Tor itself is still out there, just a little more strapped for cash than it used to be.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If this happens they should check ID at church too seeing as how children are much more likely to be abused or groomed by someone there.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    the simulatenous legislaiton from all countries seems very suspicious of a certain foreign adversary backing such motives. this isnt the first things like this happened. just a hunch.

  • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Suppose true, then we’ll reduce the use of “the whole Internet”.

    OK, we won’t, no tools yet.

    I really love Briar, except it’s functionally not quite there yet, and the desktop kind of such application synchronized with neighboring ships, so to say, with a delay-tolerant Web alternative, would be good. Over various links and media.

    Anyway, it’s not a technical problem, it’s a social problem. Not really different from ID checks on the streets and everywhere you go in the city, except much of the city got virtualized. And ID checks on the streets are automated by cameras everywhere and face recognition.

    Social problems are resolved in the legal, social, protest, civil war fields.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      ID checks on the streets and everywhere you go in the city, except much of the city got virtualized

      Except on the internet, you can still create your own street with your own rules.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If you buy\rent a house (suppose) intended as, well, housing, and make a family diner there without registration, you will break the law.

        They can easily do this with the Internet.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      If that isn’t already shorthand for “whenever, wherever, whatever” it should be.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    231
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Hell no. Just use decentralized apps, fediverse etc. It’s not about “protecting” children. It’s about full control and power. So don’t give up.

        • belit_deg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Got this response from one of the developers:

          Looks like a routing issue, it works when navigated to from the index page without a full reload.

          • neclimdul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Its a server configuration issue. If you have a SPA even server side frameworks that uses native paths you need to configure the server to send all requests to the main application. You’ll find documentation of how to do this in the setup for every framework I’ve run into.

      • johntash@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Do they publish their protocol or how it works anywhere? Their site didn’t seem to have much technical info at first glance

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      decentralized apps, fediverse

      Those apps and / or the fediverse itself would get sued into the ground and shut down one app or server at a time. There’s nothing stopping any Governments authorities from going after servers inside their borders and there’s nothing stopping them from “harmonizing” identity verification restrictions among other countries. They’ve already done it once with Intellectual Property law.

      This push to de-anonymize the Internet isn’t new either. Microsoft started this back in the oughts with their Passport / Digital-ID program. Google and Meta, along with others, long ago launched their own versions and it’s why you can sign into so many websites with a Google or Facebook account.

      It’s generally referred to as IdP and now that the Internet has been fully corporatized, with minor holdouts, you can bet your bippy that the days of anonymous access are ending.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        If only there was a non-commercial, decentralized way of doing the same thing we are already doing. Perhaps make it free too. Hmmm

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          What do you mean by that? Most of the infrastructure that makes up the internet is owned by like 6 companies.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              So do a million different forms of encryption. That doesn’t make the infrastructure any less centralized. If the people who own the fiber decide to only allow pre-approved types of traffic to cross their networks then it doesn’t make any difference what sort of protocols exist. Building free cross-country or subsea fiber routes is not economically viable and the internet doesn’t exist without them.

                • krashmo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  No it isn’t. Either traffic is allowed to flow freely or it isn’t. Once you start down the “isn’t” path there’s not much that can be done to get around the fact that a few people control a huge chunk of the infrastructure.

                • krashmo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Please explain how you can bypass carrier enforced traffic shaping policy.

                  From geti2p.net:

                  I2P’s protocols are efficient on most platforms, including cell phones, and secure for most threat models. However, there are several areas which require further improvement to meet the needs of those facing powerful state-sponsored adversaries, and to meet the threats of continued cryptographic advances and ever-increasing computing power.

                  The people involved in the project you’re referring to acknowledge that governments can, by influencing carrier policy, disrupt and subvert the project’s intended function. Why then are you implying they are incorrect?

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Last time I checked, the p!rate bay still exists. In fact there are many of them. Because the website itself is open source. The same could be done with any other site. If one gets taken down, two more pop up in it’s place.

        • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          While true, most sites do not have the fame of the pirate bay and will not see anywhere near the same number of fans hosting remakes, even if the source is available.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      It’s about the information vacuum. Now every service will get your ID or photo, giving them both age and a whole sort of other metrics to build a profile on you. And yes, Lemmy.ca doesn’t know that about me.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        Yeah so what could possibly go wrong when every site you want to use has your ID and passport etc.

      • TheMonk@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I gotta be honest I thought I’d never be able to quit Reddit. But it was a lot easier when I just did it. If this shit becomes the norm, I’ll back out of a site first time they try that shit and block the site. Maybe I’ll just have to stop using the internet. Wouldn’t that be a net positive on my life. You made me do this, capitalism.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          You made me do this, capitalism.

          This is a problem with Government not an economic system. It’s about control, not dollars, pounds, or yuan.

          • TheMonk@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            But this scene was set by capitalism. The family friendly, market friendly internet is the basis for this entire issue. Yeah, government is the one finally pulling the trigger on sanctioned, total control, but we’ve been surveilled and profiled and censored for decades at this point by countless corporations for ad dollars. We’ve gone through the cycles of outrage and acquiescence and outrage and acquiescence as things have gotten worse and worse—same goes for the quality of politician, all bought and paid for by telecom companies neutering everything we can do to make the market and internet more favorable while the politicians got worse and worse and we began accepting it and just laughing it off.

            And here we are. Don’t be fooled, this is 100% at the feet of capitalism.

          • planish@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Capitalism runs on top of government. Governments create and enforce the notion that a human, or a fictional human with fractional ownership (corporation), can in turn own arbitrarily large and important objects.

            This is often done at the behest of said arbitrarily-large-and-important-thing-owners, who also come up with other similarly terrible ideas to have the government do.

      • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Sure but it would be trivial for a company to build profiles on people using public apps like Lemmy.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          But not necessarily link it to your other accounts or real identity, which is the point.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Unless you are one of the extreme privacy people, like deep into freakaziod territory, the folks who build tracking / id systems would maybe need an afternoon to go from your Lemmy username to your home address and underwear size.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              For my account sure. I use the same username most places. But it’s also reasonable to have a fairly decent Lemmy account that’s decoupled from all your other online accounts. Use a temp email provider, VPN, and proper browser and you’re most of the way there.

              • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                There is a lot of information in the way you type and the topics you choose to discuss. More than we suspect.