maybe the most raw form of corporate media
maybe the most raw form of corporate media
well not sure if fixable
there is no way to verify the downloaded package before installation.
also I generally deem both webusb, and chrome’s broader filesystem access apis dangerous, partly because a vulnerability in the website permission checking code with this permission is much worse than with e.g. the camera.
but the more realirealistic problem is that its just too easy to grant a random website so deep permissions to your device, either by accident, by habit or because the user does not understand what is happening. just a click or two and you have just granted a ransom website full access to your drive. with webusb, they can even write a bootable anything to your pendrive.
my concern here is not that you cannot make sure that the graphene website will only do what it needs to, but that the feature exists at all, because of all the other websites. I sincerely bless mozilla for not implementing these.
oh google pay, I see. but that’s not NFC’s fault, it’s useful for other things too.
speaking about it, I’m not sure google pay will work. but I never used it, so I don’t know for sure, but there’s this suspicion after what banks do
that’s the spirit
LOS has privacy issues though, if I remember correctly. like, default DNS server is 8.8.8.8of google, assisted gps contacts a global server of I think qualcomm to speed up getting a GPS fix, and others I don’t remember now
If someone finds your phone can’t they just tear it apart and read the storage with external tools?
that’s not the problem that BL locking solves. this is solved by storage encryption. BL locking solves 2 other problems:
afaik it should. but why do you think NFC defeats privacy? it is quite short range, isn’t it? having google services is much worse
that’s not a feature of the ROM. that’s a tool provided by ROM maintainers. that being said, it almost certainly supports it, as in in someone makes a website that does that, it will be possible.
now, don’t get me started on how bad of an idea it is to use webusb
it’s not like they are the only providers. There’s plenty of other choice
Is making a profit = profiteering?
no, what I wanted to mean is wanting to make lots of money just for the sake of it, or to increase value
The ads I had in mind would be topic-based. If you’re on a supplement sub, you see suggestions for a vendor. If you’re on a web dev sub, you see VPS vendors.
yeah, exactly, that’s not so bad
correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t enshittification mean that the provider reduces functionality? it seems to me that didn’t happen
The subscription model rarely works
when the objective is profiteering and endless growth
I have an unpopular opinion that ads are still the best way to pay for servers and staff
I think that’s acceptable if it’s not based on datamining and profiling and personalization, but on context, and if ads are honest and not too attention grabbing. yeah advertise your product/service, with its benefits, and do not try to persuade people into paying for garbage
The subscription model rarely works
when the objective is profiteering and endless growth
I have an unpopular opinion that ads are still the best way to pay for servers and staff
I think that’s acceptable if it’s not based on datamining and profiling and personalization, but on context, and if ads are honest and not too attention grabbing. yeah advertise your product/service, with its benefits, and do not try to persuade people into paying for garbage
and a lot of the permissions you can only disable one by one, 3-4 taps for each of the dozens of apps, with needing 2 taps even just to see if the permission is granted for the app
and sadly, calyx and such forks don’t fix it either
maybe they don’t even think about how things on the Internet actually work, I dunno
bingo! that’s the reason behind most of their illogical decisions
just ask around, and you’ll find that they want things to just work without understanding how they work
he could just use x.com for that too
How is it easier? Do you open your HDDs and take info from there?
obviously not. often they don’t break all at once, but start with corrupting smaller areas of sectors
I would rather not buy so large SSDs. for most stuff the performance advantage is useless while the price is much larger, and my impression is still that such large SSDs have a shorter lifespan (regarding how many writes will it take to break down). recovering data fron a failing HDD is also easier: SSDs just turn read-only or completely fail at one point, in the latter case often even data recovery companies being unable to recover anything, while HDDs will often give signs that a good monitoring software can detect weeks or months before, so that you know to be more cautious with it
surveillance cameras out in the forest? what a time to be alive! say bye bye to privacy even out in the nature, because everything must be watched