

The reply was literally “*I* use a calculator” followed by “AI should use one too”. Are you suggesting that you’re an LLM or how did you cut a piece of cloth for yourself out of that?
Compulsive comment editor. All in good faith.
#Sorry not sorry
The reply was literally “*I* use a calculator” followed by “AI should use one too”. Are you suggesting that you’re an LLM or how did you cut a piece of cloth for yourself out of that?
I can visually store values and I still struggle. :(
My comment is fully compatible with Democrats enabling genocide as opposed to encouraging & enabling it like Trump does.
Can you please read carefully? I’m saying things would’ve panned out differently with Harris, mainly not fanning the flames after the ceasefire deal had been reached. Everything went out the window with Trump because he cares even less. Or tell me, would’ve Harris proposed building resorts in Gaza for the millionaires instead of, you know, rebuilding?
And would’ve Democrats taken an active role in the conflict? Nope, they wouldn’t have changed anything about what they were doing because they were passive af. The situation was reaching its own conclusion and then Trump stepped in to stir the pot again with this Gaza plans. We all saw the Trump BS coming before the election and that’s the source of my frustration. This whole Genocide Joe thing really put the blinders on some folks that we still can’t manage to remove.
Not only are you not getting what I’m saying, but you’re also breaking the rules
Wait, was that amount of groping not part of the sketch?
I don’t think it’s equal amounts of genocide because the ceasefire happened during the week of the inauguration. That’s when Trump tried to take credit for it because he kept inserting himself in the middle of it to no avail. We know that Harris wanted to distance herself from Biden’s presidency. She hesitated answering questions about Gaza seeming uncomfortable giving the expected answer, and even stated the whole situation was heartbreaking. Which means Harris wouldn’t have thought to kick out the Palestinians to build some BS money grab on their land because Biden wouldn’t have done it either anyway.
Neither Biden nor Harris would’ve given Israel reason to start back up again or fan the flames further–but Trump did because it’s a Trump Think to Do. He gave Netanyahu a plan and he was delighted to put a heave wrench in the works that he had been trying to sabotage the whole time. The only reason it’s starting up again is because Trump is enabling and actively encouraging Netanyahu to be a sociopath by steering away from the reconstruction with all these stupid alternative plans for the region that no Democrat would’ve supported (or even come up with, let’s be honest).
It wasn’t “mean things” but blatant propaganda that cost the election. And now we have even more genocide. That’s what’s fucked up. I think it’s fair to express that frustration without having people spin it.
If you’re tired of hearing it, I’m also tired of hearing how a million Gazans are being displaced so that a kleptocrat can do as he pleases. Something that could have been avoided by not discouraging voters.
Something something but Harris is worse! Am I doing it right? Sorry, I’m terrible at impressions. I can’t quite nail the arrogance.
If he were on fire I’d love to fan the flames. What a story for my grandkids that would be.
The US people wishing one thing and their stupid government doing exactly the opposite. Name a more iconic duo!
No no, you can’t do that. Only they can do that!
More like The Fart of the Deal. Pee-ew, this shit stinks every time.
I’ve been kind of on the fence about this but then research found that people who physically or verbally express their anger tend to get angrier or delay calming down, contrary to conventional wisdom. I wonder if there could be a similar pattern with this so now I’m hesitating.
I love how Gates never caught on for some reason. I wonder if it’s because they had easier targets with Hilary and Soros.
Omg I always wanted to do this but it would’ve looked only half as good. Amazing job!
It’s not quite over yet. You go on with that attitude and you won’t have any options left.
And death, yes.
I didn’t ignore it, I just interpret it differently as in, “I don’t need to do this unusual stuff everyone does without a calculator”. Calling something weird doesn’t necessarily mean it’s off-color or that it’s a trait the other person has. In my use case, weird just means unexpected or counterintuitive, and maybe complex enough that I can’t bother with describing it properly. I know because I use it that way too. Weird doesn’t have to mean a third eye on your face every time. I mean, doing the weird math thing is taught in school as a strategy.
I do want to mention that it’s not the first time I see a visceral reaction to a passing comment. I usually see this from marginalized groups, and I can assure you, both Kolanki and I are part of those too. And knowing his long comment history, I sincerely doubt he meant anyone is weird as shit.
And even if it’s a bit thought-policey, how does that warrant calling someone a fascist and going off on them like that? That’s also a bit weird (as in odd).