• beSyl@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I made a post recently, wondering what we could do to get a larger userbase on lemmy. Many people kept saying “why larger? This size is good”, even though I stated my reason for wanting a larger userbase in the OP.

    This post, right here, also shows a benefit of having a larger userbase and something I miss from reddit: actual research scientists coming to the comments explaining the paper and whatnot. I think decreasing the distance from research scientists to the general public is a good idea. And I want them on lemmy. I would love for lemmy to be a little bit less memes and a little bit more… Serious.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      But a larger community also means people like that conspiracy poster coming here and degrading the quality of the conversation. It’s a double edged sword. I think we should encourage quality user growth over just quantity. Of course, that’s easier said than done. But my point is that growth in and of itself is a poor measure of success: we want growth of competent users.

      • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Ok, but having more than 3 responders per post in less common communities would be great. Like, not even the writing or art comms get more than that.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Of course, I don’t disagree. I just want to encourage us to seek good comments. You could fill the comment section with 100 low quality posts and it wouldn’t meaningfully improve things.

          • IndefiniteBen@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Sure, as long as we allow good comments with opposing views. We don’t want just an echo chamber filled with good comments. It might sound good but it isn’t healthy long-term.

  • JayObey711@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was in the hospital with myocarditis after recieving the first shot. Got better after a long recovery. Got the second and third shot as soon as I could. A little hospital times seems worth it when the alternative is permanent brain, lung and heart damage.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think this could also be generalized into something like “Conservative struggles with colors other than black, white”

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m just looking at that “top 1% poster” label next to their name realizing that there’s no way that anybody in that particular sub is going to believe a qualified professional over their own personal biases.

  • Albbi@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    Top 1% poster and a top 1% commenter. Reminds me of the quote: “A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes”

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    274
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They aren’t struggling with comprehension, they are being deliberate about misrepresenting the facts.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, we should invent new words for this, they aren’t stupid, they weaponise stupidity for their own gains.

      • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        That word is disinformation

        They know it’s a lie, they’re posting it anyway because they think the ends justify the means

        • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          What they post/say is misinformation but the act of doing it knowingly, “shamelessly trying to fuck you over” is what I can come up with.

          • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            misinformation is posting incorrect information accidentally

            disinformation is posting incorrect information intentionally

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      i remember the days before conservatives antivaxxers took over the sub, right befor trump was elected. you can actually have a conversation with them, without having them doubling down.

      • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, they (OP or whoever told OP about it) probably started reading the paper with a predetermined conclusion and read until they found the data that “supported” it.

        They “did their own research”

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, this. They don’t want to know facts. They are actively resisting reality. Doesn’t matter that ~40 people per million per two doses had adverse effects to the vaccine and most likely recovered just fine while hundreds of thousands got sick and died from the disease and who knows how many survived because they were vaccinated.

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              There is nothing “Concrete” at all in your claim. In fact, the study makes sure to point out the value of vaccination. If we actually interpret what the data says we should note that the largest increases in risk is after the second dose, and points out that timing of the vaccination is probably a factor. In no way does it say that younger men should not be vaccinated. If anything, waiting longer after a covid infection or not giving the second dose would more closely align any adverse effects with the general population.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                the study makes sure to point out the value of vaccination.

                I did not mention the value of vaccination

                In no way does it say that younger men should not be vaccinated.

                And in no way did I say that. I said young men should not be boosted, I.e. second dose.

                • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I did not mention the value of vaccination

                  That’s literally the whole point of trials for vaccines, to determine if they work and what the side effects there are if any. Public health officials then use that data to determine if, how and when to distribute the vaccines based on of those risks of the vaccine outweigh the public health risks of the continued diseas spread

                  In a global pandemic when millions of people are dying, a 1/10000 risk of reduced quality of life that helps 10/10000 people not die of the pandemic disease and another 100/10000 not experience reduced quality of life from the pandemic disease is pretty easy numbers to say “yes roll it out” because the benefits far outweigh the risks

                • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  No, you said there was “concrete evidence” that “young men should not have been boosted”.

                  That is opinion, and the study makes no corroborating claim to not vaccinate or boost.

    • Wilco@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is a hobby with flat Earthers, MAGA, and antivaxxers. They make weird shit up and then pretend to believe it. Numerology. Conspiracy theories. They dont think there is any harm in it and like to troll “the libs” and debate them to waste everyone’s time. The bad thing is that you get a portion of them that start truly believing these tales … we have a few dozen holding US offices now.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    i had covid-19 recently , in sept the extremely painful sore throat, i believe it partially triggered my background atopic dermatitis an early flareup.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        also funny thing is during the whole fever/symptomatic phase the dermatitis rash “turned off” a sign is when the dead dry skin starts flaking instead of being bumpy or red, and my skin was very smooth. it did suppress the immune system long enough for that to happen, i think its the rebound effect. i do hear that some peoples AD gets worst under COVID, and others just shuts off like mines ,temporarily.

        • fiat_lux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Super interesting. Maybe your immune system wasn’t so much suppressed, but just too occupied with everything else being on fire to focus on only your skin… But then why would it get worse for other people instead? Both COVID and bodies are really annoyingly complicated.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    2 days ago

    The sub’s mods deleted the comment too. I see it’s every bit as much of a cesspool as it always was over there

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      i remember the days when anti-vaxxers or conservatives hadnt taken over the sub. before it turned into a full political conspiracy sub.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      You know the paradox of tolerance? The idea that if you believe in tolerance, then you have to be intolerant of intolerance.

      I think this general concept is applicable in many areas. Like, it makes sense to be nonviolent except in preventing more violence.

      And in this case, we should all make a giant conspiracy to destroy the places where conspiracy theorists talk to each other.

      • Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The paradox disappears the moment, you handle tolerance differently.

        Handle it like a social contract that everyone is automatically part of. All are tolerated until they stop tolerating people who are also part of the contract.

        Whoever stops tolerating people who are part of the contract loses their “being tolerated privileges”.

    • randoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thank you.

      If COVID infection did increase Myocarditis risk by 40x, wouldn’t you expect to see it in the results?

      It’s rare so it probably still makes sense to vaccinate, especially considering the lives saved by herd immunity. How many kids were orphaned because their parents didn’t do so well?

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If COVID infection did increase Myocarditis risk by 40x, wouldn’t you expect to see it in the results?

        Not if it were 1< in 100,000 to start with.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a top 1% poster too, so you can be sure that entire sub reddit is overflowing with bullshit theories made up by the feeble, unable to understand what they’re looking at

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why hidde the usernames? It proven the if someone wants to find it, they will.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      If one person wants to find it there’s no problem. It’s when a whole bunch of people all think they’ve been given license to brigade a thread and start cyberbullying someone that things get unpleasant.