• Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    27 minutes ago

    Millennial here. I don’t remember that either. I feel like my life has been in survival mode from one once in a lifetime crisis to the next and my dad died from issues from agent orange exposure in Vietnam and my mom died from early onset Alzheimer’s after she worked hard her entire life and lost everything after 2008 not because she didn’t work hard and save but because she was layed off at the height of the Great Recession and burned through her deflated 401k and then began to get sick and lost her home and moved in with me but I couldn’t access healthcare for her in this evil system and her slow horrible death was beyond traumatic for my small family. Things keep getting more expensive and corrupt everyday. When is it time to burn this mother down? And hold the pedofile parasite class accountable and take our power back? I don’t think we want much just the ability to live in a system with integrity and to not have to worry about being cast on the streets to die in squalid conditions

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    “Good old days”

    Terms and conditions apply. Mainly that you were a white cis-het male and were christian or at least willing to go along with the charade. And didn’t get drafted into war. And didn’t have to work in a coal mine or some other dangerous line of work.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I am GenX and in my 20s lived stuffed into houses with 2 other couples so that we could make rent, I am not sure why people think we were skating on minimum wage, it was shit. If you put 6 wage earners in a house you can make it today too.

    On college cost, that is absolutely true I do agree, it’s gotten so expensive it is not an automatic choice among my kids. Those who went straight out of school mostly didn’t have to borrow, nor did I pay much, they got scholarships to cover it.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.

    Millennials and zoomers are essentially the “hard times make good men” crowd like the greatest generation.

    Unfortunately, I’m not too confident on “good men make good times” this time around.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m late 30s myself. Here is how I see the generational situations:

      My parents’ generation: if you got any college degree or went into any skilled trade, you would have no problem purchasing a home.

      My generation: if you picked certain well-paying majors or trades, you would be able to own a home.

      The generation currently coming out of school: you will not afford a home without inherited wealth/family assistance.

      It went from nearly anyone could get a home, to those who made just the optimal choices could get a home, to basically no one can get a home. I work with people who graduated with the same degree I have, yet because they happened to be born a 10-15 year later, they’re locked out of home ownership. I look at the cost of housing and compare it to their salary, and there’s just no way to make it work. To buy a home around here as a young person, you either need family money or you need to be a married couple, both working full time in high-paying STEM fields.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Some misconceptions here. The good old days that still existed in the ‘80s and early ‘90s were kinda still there, but the signs of economic retreat were there too. We were offshoring a lot of manufacturing, bankruptcies were tools to get rid of pensions and union strength, and then everything Reagan did to fuck us that just wasn’t apparent yet. They weren’t the good old days that the Boomers had, but they were far better than today.

    You could still rent a place for a few hundred bucks on a single job, community college was ~$50/semester not including textbooks. A cheap house in a not so great area was ~$100k, often a lot less. People didn’t use credit cards the way they do now so debt wasn’t as common, it was harder to spend money you didn’t have. You could still claw your way ahead or at least tread water.

    2000 was a turning point. The dot com bust, 9/11, offshoring of even more jobs in tech, multiple recessions, endless war, and corporations running out of ideas other than finding ways to extract more and more from the consumer while offering less in return. Every generation since has had to deal with more things being put out of reach.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Even in the 2010s it was still possible in some areas. I bought my first home in 2012, right at the bottom of the market. I bought a townhouse in a half-built development in a rough neighborhood. This was in Houston. The developer had gone under halfway through building the place. It was weird, but the place only cost $92k for a 3 bedroom 1800 ft^2 townhouse. I put 3% down on an FHA mortgage. I literally got into home ownership for less than people pay to get into an apartment lease today. Oh, and the mortgage was small enough that for several years I paid the entire mortgage by renting out the two spare bedrooms. The coastal areas were pretty unaffordable even back in the early 2010s. But at least then if you lived there and wanted to, you could move to a lower cost of living city elsewhere in the US and get established. Now? Everywhere is unaffordable.

  • Ocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wish zoomers were anti-capitalist because they understood that the “good old days” were only “good” because of the exploitation of the global South.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You know what’s even funnier/saddening? When people who never experienced “the good old times” will still defend inequality and conservative values because those promise a full blown lie of “we actually bring prosperity” while accusing the left of “defending their elites’ privileges”

  • CombatWombat@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We are At War now, according to President Bush, and I take him at his word. He also says this War might last for “a very long time.”
    Generals and military scholars will tell you that eight or 10 years is actually not such a long time in the span of human history – which is no doubt true – but history also tells us that 10 years of martial law and a war-time economy are going to feel like a Lifetime to people who are in their twenties today. The poor bastards of what will forever be known as Generation Z are doomed to be the first generation of Americans who will grow up with a lower standard of living than their parents enjoyed.
    That is extremely heavy news, and it will take a while for it to sink in. The 22 babies born in New York City while the World Trade Center burned will never know what they missed. The last half of the 20th century will seem like a wild party for rich kids, compared to what’s coming now. The party’s over, folks. The time has come for loyal Americans to Sacrifice. … Sacrifice. … Sacrifice. That is the new buzz-word in Washington. But what it means is not entirely clear.

    From Hunter S Thompson: https://www.espn.com/page2/s/thompson/010918.html

    Still wild to me that he was publishing stuff like that for ESPN. Can you imagine ESPN putting something like that about Trump on the page today?

  • ClownStatue@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Those “good old days” were propped up by strong unions, excellent public education, high taxes on the ultra-wealthy, and not much regulation beyond not letting another stock market crash happen (See also: rivers literally on fire in Ohio and elsewhere).

    So, 3 Good Things, and 1 really Bad Thing (that makes a lot of money). We’re currently speed running back towards the Bad Thing, we’ve effectively killed unions, public education has long since been gutted, and taxing the ultra-wealthy at all is basically un-American. So…

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Growing up, I didn’t even know how powerful unions were.

      My mom worked at a factory and hurt herself when I was a kid. She couldn’t work for months. The union was why I was able to still get food and do hospital visits. She healed up and went right back to work.

      With my first kid, my wife’s job decided her pregnancy was interfering with their need for labor so they fired her. They made it ABSOLUTELY CLEAR it wasn’t a pregnancy-related firing over and over again, but that she wasn’t meeting expectations… Because her body hurts from being pregnant. No legal protection either.

      • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What gets me is that the vast majority of Americans actually believe they still have these protections when they don’t. Like, they aren’t even AWARE of the problem.

        Go to any work related discussion and you’ll hear people going on and on about how you can’t get fired for this or that or you’re entitled to one thing or another and 90% if the time they are totally incorrect.

    • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The ultra wealthy weren’t even really taxed that much back then due to loopholes. There’s a reason why many 20th century oligarchs have their names on libraries, public university buildings, and hospitals.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You’re confusing means for ends.

        What you’re focusing on was that the rich never actually ended up paying those 90% marginal tax rates on their income. But the point of those taxes wasn’t to raise revenue; it was to force changes in behavior. Them donating to all those big hospitals and universities wasn’t a bug, it was a feature. The goal was to force rich people to spend or give away their money instead of hoarding it. Which is ultimately the goal. I ultimately would rather have someone make and spend a billion in a year than make and save a billion in a year. I actually don’t mind if the rich have extravagant homes and yachts, as they have to hire a hell of a lot of people to build and maintain those luxuries.

        High marginal taxes also encouraged companies to give better pay and bonuses to their workers. That was actually the origin of the large end-of-year bonus corporate America traditionally gave out. If your company is sitting on a large pile of extra profits at the end of the year, rather than paying the high marginal tax rate, it made sense to give the extra cash out as a large Christmas bonus to employees.

        What you’re talking about wasn’t a loophole. It was the entire purpose for having those high rates.

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Capatilism is only possible when you steal value from someone or somewhere else.

    The US financially raped the rest of the world to generate it’s vast wealth.

    China saw the opportunity to steal this wealth back itself by convincing US companies to abandon their manufacturing capabilities. Now we are watching the slow decline of the world’s default nobility as they scramble to justify their value.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tech bros running scared that America is going to collapse so they cling to AI because the only thing that could save this continent would be a fucking miracle tech breakthrough.

      Ugh it all makes sense. I hate it when it makes sense. Occam’s razor has not been kind lately.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The world would be do different if the western world had a kill pigs list in the 50’s.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Capatilism is only possible when you steal value from someone or somewhere else.

      I don’t know about “Capatalism” but “Capitalism” doesn’t require stealing value. All capitalism requires is private ownership of the means of production and using it to generate profit. If you’re a painter and buy paint, an easel and some canvas, and use that to sell portraits, you’re doing capitalism.

      Most zoomers are anti-capitalist because they don’t actually know what capitalism is, and can’t really picture what it would actually be like in a different kind of economic system. Anybody who grew up after 1989 hasn’t actually seen a world where any other economic system exists. Capitalism was an attempt to improve a world dominated by monopolies, with big tariffs and trade barriers, where workers had no freedom to change jobs and had to fight over the scraps left over from the wealthy. If that sounds like the current world, it’s because we’re backsliding from capitalism back towards mercantilism and feudalism. Not because capitalism sucks.

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You steal value by creating monopolies. You steal it by artificial controlling resources, your “capital” so that no one else can benifit. You price gouge, manipulate, spread propaganda, and lie. Make dirty deals behind closed doors. Undercut your competition.

        Pro capitalist always leave out all the awful tactics capatilism employs to do things that require you to buy from them. That’s the theft. Gaming the system to put people in hard places. Baiting the general populace to bad behaviors all for the means of profit.

        We shouldn’t be required to play a game of literal monopoly to survive.

        Free market capatilism is a joke. Capatilism only drives invitation of the business model and freedom for the owning class at the expense of the people.

        What’s the difference between feudalism and capatilism when corporations own ever piece of property on this spec of dust and you’re required to rent? Still playing the rules of capital, but without any of the rewards. Think about it. I doubt you own your house. The bank probably owns it just like it owns a majority of peoples. Probably the same thing with your car. Your education. Hell even your life depending on how your health is. People who have to pay 1000s to insurance companies every year just to stay alive. For insulin treatment that was sold for a 1$ by its creator for the good of humanity. Monopolized. You aren’t a capitalst if you own nothing.

        Most people own nothing because that’s the goal of capatilism.

        The perfect company has no employees, sells no product, carries no debts, yet takes from everyone it can. It is the nature of capatilism to shuffle towards this structure.

        The US in the 1989s had Europe and the rest of the world by the balls by being the global reserve currency. A system put in place after world war 2 where Europe basically sold itself to the United States. Everyone had to spend money and buy it in debt while the US had the keys to the printing press.

        When you take out a loan why do they charge you interest? If you don’t pay your loan back they will simply toss you in prison or reposes what meager property you have. Garnish your wages? What incitive does interest serve? It’s just their to keep you paying, to keep you under your feudal lord.

        Somethings just shouldn’t have a price tag and should be owned by the people.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Capitalism != free market.

        Under a free market, a painter buys paint, an easel and some canvas at prices set by supply and demand, and then paints and sells portraits again at a price set by supply and demand.

        Under capitalism, an artist wants to start a painting business, so he goes to a rich person or group of rich people and says “If you give me some money to start my painting business, I will give you a share in ownership of the business and its profits.” with this so-called capital, the artist rents or buys a building and supplies and operates the business to effectively pay back that loan. The working class make a living and the rich get richer for having been rich.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The term capitalism was coined by socialists to describe existing systems where wealth accumulated into the hands of the bourgeoisie. Only later did the supporters of the existing system attempt to “reclaim” capitalism and change the meaning to this nonsense. Capitalism is not “an attempt to improve a world dominated by monopolies,” monopolies are the bread and butter of capitalism.

        Painters owned their own paint supplies under feudalism. Were they “doing capitalism?” No, capitalism is not something you “do” on an individual level, it is a system that exists, and which has only existed for a few hundred years. Capitalism does not mean simply trading or owning tools.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Monopolies are the bread and butter of mercantilism. Capitalism was seen as a way to break up those monopolies.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    8 hours ago

    In order to have a middle class, you need government subsidies for the working class and regulations on the robber baron class.

    FDR started to do that. And do it went for a couple decades. Hence the booming 50s with a house and car got everyone on a single income.

    Then, in 1981, Reagan happened. The subsidization of the working class was slowly peeled back. More was given to the robber baron class.

    Which brings us to where we are now. + Dictator voted into office on top of that. So, no help there.

      • Shirasho@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        If I could erase one person from history it would not be Adolf Hitler. It would not be any other dictator alive or otherwise. It would be Reagan. The amount of harm he caused not to just the US but the entire world is astronomical and has caused the suffering of hundreds of millions of people and the death of tens of millions.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I mean both are horrible, but the problem with Reagan is that he knew how to hide his atrocities. People don’t really grapple with how bad what he did was because he wasn’t overthrown by the Allies in a Great War, there was no purpose-built death camps, he didn’t make rambling speeches declaring entire races as vermin.

          He just quietly let AIDS happen, pretending it’s not a real thing. He deregulated banks for the sake of “competition”. He fucked with the Middle East.

          We compare Trump to Hitler a lot, but he’s like a more outwardly fascist Reagan.

  • super_user_do@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Many early zoomers (1993 to 2006) may remember something of the world before 2008 crisis and before neoliberalism fucked the ideas of the American left. We had the opportunity to experience a slower way of life and peace of mind. Many of us also had the opportunity to witness the very few last years when traditional family was still a thing. Late zoomers and Gen alpha have never experienced nothing like that

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Aye, I still try to emulate that shit sometimes. As annoying as it is to have my music knocked out at times it’s nice to go through a cellular dead zone ya know? Now if only 07 and 06 weren’t some of the worst years of my life due to my physically and sexually abusive father combined with the shit fest that was foster “care”.

  • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Millennials are anticapitalist for the opposite reason. We DO remember the good old days.

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Not all of us. I was born in the late 80s, and grew up pulling food out of garbage cans because my family didn’t make enough money to feed all five of us.

        • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          In my experience, people who refer to any era as ‘the good old days’ are ignoring large amounts of inequality that existed in that time period.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The 90s were a happy accident in which technological breakthrough could actually sate the endless hunger of capitalism

    • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Certainly the 90s were more stable and prosperous for more people than today, but to say those were the good old days means you would have to ignore:

      • Extreme urban decay
      • Unchecked police violence against minorities
      • Vile homophobia in the mainstream and no recognition at all of trans people
      • The rise of commodified suburban housing, stores, and restaurants
      • Our government’s Imperial ambition becoming completely unchecked in the wake of the fall of the Soviet Union

      There were never good old days.

      EDIT: also, isn’t that when school shootings really took off?

      • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m obviously not saying the past was perfect, I’m saying we remember a world where a lot of families got on pretty well with 1 parent working paying for a home, cars, vacation, hobbies, etc.

        • humanamerican@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I also took a pretty US centric view of your comment. If you’re from a country in which the 90s were indeed The Good Times, just ignore me.

          In the US, there were probably more people living stable middle class lives than there are today but there was still a very large and mostly ignored underclass, and there always has been.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Most of us were like “holy shit, Nintendo 64. Whoa, PlayStation. Dude, you got a Dell! It’s got a SoundBlaster! Check out this new Internet thing! It’s got the World Wide Web! I’m gonna gel my hair and skateboard listening to Korn on my Discman with antiskip while eating 3d Doritos”

        And if you asked us about world events we would have been like “gulf war was lame”

        We were too young to really have known about how bad shit was getting, and the internet was just taking off and info did not travel like it does today. Video on a computer was an novelty (lots of windows loyalists called Apple’s QuickTime a gimmick and that it’d never last; until they got a video player themselves) and it took hours to download a few MB. There was no YouTube or TikTok, no live streams, barely any “feeds”, nothing was pushed to you, no WiFi even. Going on the computer was a purposeful activity you spent a slice of your day doing, like reading a book or gaming.

        We did not have the window to the world we have now. We all like to pretend that it’s getting worse; and it IS, but also we’re just now waking up to the lie we were told our whole lives and just how deep that lie goes.

      • abbadon420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 hours ago

        America’s decline really started with Richard Nixon. I’m not an expert though.

        In the Netherlands, the 90’s were pretty good. I’m sure there were downsides,but there always are.

        The economy was good. We had a firm social safety net, maybe even too firm. That is now only a shell of its former self.

        The general acceptance of the gay community was on the uprise. The media was becoming gay positive, because of some key public figures. Trans not so much, only in the form of “drag queens” and such.

        Some things that are bad today, were bad than. Environmental issues, animal rights, gender equality, institutionalized racism.

        Most things are getting better now, but the economy is shit. That is fully to blame on capitalism. There are voices in power for change, but not enough.

        • rayyy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          A long time ago, I heard someone say that a Swedish drunk laying in a gutter knows more about American politics than the average American college graduate - it is true.

      • Greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The extreme urban decay of the 90s is to the extreme urban decay of the 20s just as Office Spaces hell of office cubes and meaningless work is to the deeper, darker hell of gig work and poverty.

        Shit was shit, its just that shit wasn’t as shit as it is now.

        I brought up how Office Space is supposed to be about a hellish environment… I’ve never had a cubical to myself, or a computer I can leave at work at 5pm. Its 2026 and I find myself wishing for the hell that Peter finds himself in, as its far, far more comfortable than the hell we have now.

        • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I hated that movie the first time I watched it. Found it terrifying.

          The work and environment wasn’t the scary part, but how much people were willing to do something they felt hatred towards without protest.

    • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I was born in 88 and I remember my parents doing ok, but by the time I hit the workforce I saw no good old days. The 2008 crash happened right as I was priming up for adult life and I’ve watched any prosperity for my generation fade out of existence for as long as I can remember. I’ve only ever known decay of the “American dream” and have seen time and again corporations and capitalists robbing us of our future.

  • thelasthippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    i’m 36. i have young coworkers and i try telling them that even 10-15 years ago it was not like this.

    • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Maybe not in the “developed” countries, but capitalism been fucking the rest of the world for a long while.

      Also, are you forgetting the economic recession in 2008? That also wasn’t terribly fun. Millenials haven’t had a great go at this “good old days” either. Maybe when we were children, but it’s not like we were out buying houses then.

      Also, 10 years ago was 2016, which is when all this awful really dove off a cliff for those in the “developed” world.

      • thelasthippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        it’s difficult to explain concisely, it boils down to this; ten years ago i could rent an apartment while serving tables, today i cannot.