I can’t imagine this helping someone, but on the off chance, if you used org and are wondering what to use, s/org/li/ works for me and seems quicker than the gone one.
well, especially since se also works as a domain, so I originally was expecting, to use related syntax for fun se|li (or plain old se/li) and had to go back and reread. At first read it as se/org/li as in, “se OR org OR li” work and I thought, “no, they just said org doesn’t work.” Then I reread and recognized the sed pattern.
Okay, so you’re either 15 and think this is cool, or an actuall adult who actually is dumb enough to think that being a daddy’s boy and a cheater and a brwggwr about being a daddy’s boy is a flex.
Man you’re one sad little boy, and no, you’re not okay
I can’t imagine this helping someone, but on the off chance, if you used org and are wondering what to use,
s/org/li/works for me and seems quicker than the gone one.This is the fediverse you don’t need to be cryptic about it
https://annas-archive.li/
s/org/li isn’t being cryptic. That’s a common way to write “substitute org with li”
At least use
|for theORstatement.A “common way”? It’s sed syntax. Non-technical people will not get it.
I am technical and it was not clicking
Ed is the standard editor
https://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed-msg.en.html
Well, common in certain circles. Definitely cryptic for everybody else, though.
I had no idea what the fuck they were talking about. Thank you.
Common within a very small niche. I got it, but still assumed you were trying to circumvent some kind of censorship
I’d wager a lot of people from that small niche are registered on the Fediverse, though.
Aye. Bookmarking this thread to remind people when I see complaints Lemmy isn’t taking off enough except for super technical topics.
I use that syntax during work and still needed a hint to mentally parse the comment this way
well, especially since se also works as a domain, so I originally was expecting, to use related syntax for fun se|li (or plain old se/li) and had to go back and reread. At first read it as se/org/li as in, “se OR org OR li” work and I thought, “no, they just said org doesn’t work.” Then I reread and recognized the sed pattern.
Yeah, press x to doubt
I used these expressions too and when you see them, you know what it is
Absolutely insufferable linux nerds will be the death of lemmy.
Are you okay?
I don’t know, you tell me.
Okay, so you’re either 15 and think this is cool, or an actuall adult who actually is dumb enough to think that being a daddy’s boy and a cheater and a brwggwr about being a daddy’s boy is a flex.
Man you’re one sad little boy, and no, you’re not okay
I love how autistic lemmy is.
So… not ok?
You sound like a real twat.
The audacity to call somebody else unsufferable
Its always projection with these spoiled nepo babies.
What else should he call someone who is insufferable?
Recognize a joke challenge, difficulty impossible
That’s what you call a joke? Are you German?
You think this is how Germans behave? Damn.
Germans behave (in the overwhelming majority) way better than this. But their sense of humor is often… A little different.
“German humour is a serious thing, it is in no laughing matter”
And I have the suspicion you are an Italian living in Germany anyway.
You know, you could just ask what that means
s/org/limeans replaceorgwithliall down votes are from power users who don’t know how to make themselves clear for general audiences
I don’t think sed syntax should be used that casually, but saying what they said is outright disrespectful.
I don’t think what he did made sense but the response was far more pointlessly annoying
And they they wonder why their favorite tech isn’t more widely adopted.