The Department of Justice left multiple unredacted photos of fully nude women or girls exposed as part of Friday’s dump of more than 3.5 million pages of files related to the investigations and prosecutions of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Unlike the majority of the images in the released files, both the nudity and the faces of the people were not redacted, making them easy to identify. In some of the photos, the women or girls were either fully nude or partially undressed, posed for cameras, and exposed their genitals.

The files include more than 2,000 videos and 180,000 images, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said Friday in a press conference, including “large quantities of commercial pornography and images that were seized from Epstein’s devices,” some of which were taken by Epstein, according to Blanche.

Archive: http://archive.today/2isdD

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I thought they were stalling on this so they could protect the victims. Or at least that was their bullshit narrative.

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      They’ve got a different definition of victim, and they are doing their best (which isn’t very good, frankly, they’re very incompetent) to censor any mention of him. Or to take it down after accidentally posting it. Again, they’re very incompetent.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t disagree that they’re incompetent. But in this particular case what they’re doing isn’t incompetent at all. Surely you’ve noticed that anything in there that has Trumps name next to it is all things that couldn’t be corroborated. Or things that couldn’t be followed up on for one reason it another.

        They took his name off from anything that was potentially investigated and proven, and left the “she says…” statements that have had no investigative follow-up so they can say “look how honest we are. Yes he’s in there but none of it is actually provable”

        Its a greasy, and slimy and frankly pure evil scheme. But its not an incompetent one.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      No, I think the idea is now if you download the newest epstein files they can charge YOU with CSAM. Even if you didn’t know it was there when you downloaded it.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Generally no, laws like that are written with exceptions for law enforcement in the course of their normal duties. It’d be trivial to argue in court that that’s what this is, and the reason for the redaction failure is the deadline Congress set.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This administration is comic book levels of both evil and incompetence.

    “The citizens are screaming at us for taking too long redacting everything, so just release everything.”

    Proceeds to publish CSAM

  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I don’t believe this was missed at all. Even if it’s a bad look for the admin it’ll still soak up hundreds of hours of talk time when we should be talking about the depraved shit the victims statements accused Trump of doing to them.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Let’s not get hyper focused on Trumpy to the point that rest of the fuck wits, nonces, and pieces of shits get to skate by.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Well perhaps decent to focus on the dude with the US nuclear arsenal at his whim a little bit…

        Not that I think it diminishes any other mentions there.

        Their whole goal, flood the zone with everything, few people keep up with one thing.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If you still believe they only held back enough to protect Trump, you’re not paying attention.

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Amazing how much more consistant they never miss to redact people listed as co-conspirators… but so frequently miss the one thing they are actually supposed to be redacting

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Man, the disintegration of Trump’s base is fascinating to watch. The DOJ just gave up censoring things and released a shit load of unredacted files. Yes, there is CSAM but importantly the files are wide open and showing everything. And boy does it look really bad for a lot of people who were all wrapped up with Epstein.

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      And boy does it look really bad for a lot of people who were all wrapped up with Epstein.

      I look forward to the infighting.

      • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s interesting that allegedly the “pizza” code talk was in there.

        Go figure - it was Donvict’s BFF that is the sex trafficker talking in code referencing pizza.

        Not Podesta, not Hillary Clinton and not Obama, operating out of the basement of Comet Ping Pong or whatever the fuck…

  • kungen@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I wouldn’t be surprised if it was intentional. “Why are you wanting to see all the files instead of just reading the normal news? Are you a nonce or what?”