The home, which was run by an order of Catholic nuns and closed in 1961, was one of many such institutions that housed tens of thousands of orphans and unmarried pregnant women who were forced to give up their children throughout much of the 20th century.

In 2014, historian Catherine Corless tracked down death certificates for nearly 800 children who died at the home in Tuam between the 1920s and 1961 — but could only find a burial record for one child.

  • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember everyone getting all bent out of shape by Sinead O’Connor ripping up a picture of the Pope.

    She was a couple of years early, but right.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Islam in and of itself is not problematic, not anymore than Christianity at least. Like with literally every religion, it’s the strict conservatives within the religion that are the ones who enforce ridiculous mores and dress codes and other things that are detrimental to the health of the followers of that religion.

            • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Again, religion does not equal church. She spent a lot of time as a Catholic trying to make other Catholics see the evils within the church. I think she just became tired of being the town cryer in a world that doesn’t give a shit. And Islam, the religion and belief system not the various organized churches, might have held some amount of peace for her soul. Criticizing her for converting and not starting a whole new crusade to stop the myriad of abuse found within the various sects of Islam is just silly. Especially since there are already a million voices pointing out the faults in the Islamic churches already.

              • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Sinéad AKA Shuhada begs to differ

                “This is to announce that I am proud to have become a Muslim. This is the natural conclusion of any intelligent theologian’s journey. All scripture study leads to Islam. Which makes all other scriptures redundant. I will be given (another) new name. It will be Shuhada’”

                — Shuhada’ Davitt (@MagdaDavitt77) AKA Sinéad O’Connor

                She left main stream catholicism before the SNL incident: “The 51-year-old was previously ordained a priest by a breakaway Catholic sect, the Irish Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church, in the late 1990s” source: Irish Post

                She was a troubled being (who wouldn’t be with her childhood?), so not all her decisions are relatable. Converting to main stream (Sunni) Islam still sticks out as weird.

                • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, you are still pinning her for her belief in Islam because members of Islam have been and continue being vile detestable people. But they aren’t vile detestable people because of their belief in Islam any more than the Christians, Catholic or otherwise, are evil because of their belief in Christianity. They are vile and detestable people regardless of their belief. Their religious beliefs isn’t the source, though it does end up being a justification for those acts. But that’s just sophistry used to cover their own prejudices.

                  She dumped Christianity and chose a different religion. That doesn’t make her culpable for the evils of that religion any more than anyone else is for the deeds of others who believe in the same religion they do.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, like that’ll help.

        Wait, I think you’re right, I always write my comments in the deadpan sarcasm of a Gilfoyle from Silicon Valley. I assume it carries over TCP/IP and HTML… Guess not.

        Oh, and here: /s, apply to my first sentence.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ever since Trumps 1st term satire and sarcams have been slowly dying. Since then it’s gotten so bad that now matter how outlandish your post/comment is - there is a maga cult member who’ll top whatever you wrote and is completely serious about it.

          Yeah, I’m going to use /s every time.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If there was an infant death, it would also have been reported to authorizes and given proper respects. The number of deaths is way to high, but SIDS is real and atheists wouldn’t have dumped the bodies in a mass grave in the backyard.

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          This was my original comment: Get informed and stop being an apoligist

          I indeed misinterpreted the intention of the comment I replied to and leave this here so the comment chain still makes sense. However, I still disagree with the word choice especially with putting SIDS forward.

          Sources:

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You vastly misinterpreted the intention of my comment. I was merely pointing out the other thing the church is guilty of.

            You linked me the Behind the Bastards episode, but I also linked that same souce earlier.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Sorry, in the context of the many apologists in this thread still trying to smear the historian and to gloss over the atrocities and you bringing up SIDS I missed you intention.

              I still disagree with youur comment though. I think that is it less likely for an atheist organisation to commit the same atrocities and there being no known incidents of similar coverups. Still, any organization starving and mistreating children will try hide their crimes and their victims bodies regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof.

              In short: I agree with your intent but I disagree with how you worded it.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                My only point is that even if an infant dies under the watch of a secular or atheist org, which even with top facilities, statically will happen eventually, the deceased will be treated with dignity. SIDS is the first example I could think of because people still aren’t sure what causes it or what to do about it.

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I think I understand where you are coming from. The undignified disposal of corpses is the least of the commited atrocities in in this facility. The infant mortality rate was 5 times the average of the time, the children were malnourished and abused. Take a look at the other sources.

                  In this context mentioning SIDS comes across as an apology. If a non-denominational facility would murder and abuse children at this rate they’ll also hide the corpses. The core issue isn’t dignified burial but abuse and murder.