Sorry, I’m way too busy too to explore this total and utter strawman any further.

‘I’m gonna stay in my shitty abusive relationship I’ll just cheat on them’ is not a good POV IMHO.

That’s literally the worst interpretation of the situation.

A bit similar to you I can’t understand people staying in an abusive relationship - as in I can’t imaging this happening to me. Quite similar as I can’t understand how people can have anorexia. Yet it is indisputable that both exist and people are suffering from them. If you don’t have any cases within your family or acquaintances just look it up there are loads of sources both from psych help sites and just novels.

Then your reply should have been along the lines of “Picking a murderer instead of a rapist isn’t better”.

FYI, they have picked a mass murderer more than once in the past. Being person of the year isn’t necessarily an honor.

Your reasoning is apparently based on 2 premises: 1. Cheating is the absolute worst thing a human being can do. Abuse is just another Wednesday. 2. Everything is either black or white. There are no grey areas.

Like most people I tend to give abuse victims a lot of slack. Cheating is bad but in the case of an abuse victim I frankly don’t give a fuck. I’m gonna repeat that: Cheating is bad. In case of abuse however I don’t care.

I’m not sure if your singular focus on creating comes from being cheated on or from having an unusually high tolerance towards abusers.

If it’s the former I’m sorry that happened to you. However you need to stop defending abusers.

If it’s the latter: get bent.

But you did. Not in so many words, but you said it.

Where?

I have a ton of empathy for abuse victims.

It’s pretty obvious that you don’t.

Having something shitty done to you, doesn’t mean it’s okay for you to be shitty.

I did not say that.

This person is shitty there for it’s okay to be shitty to them’

I did not say that.

you create a slippery slope that could easily be used by shitty people against good people.

So, according to you malignant narcissists are good people? Okay

I find your lack of empathy for abuse victims quite concerning TBH.

Consider the following (IMO common) scenario: One spouse is abusive and does not care about the children. Maybe it’s a malignant narcissist and their family is like property for them.

The other spouse cares about the children and may be the only one doing any real parenting. Also they suffer the loveless, abusive marriage. At some point they meet someone that cares for them and somehow that leads to cheating before they can escape the marriage.

In this scenario the children should stay with the cheater and the alimony should not be depending on who cheated. (Both IMO of course).

Not consuming implying you’re wrong but I’d really like to see that list.

I rather think he’s trying to tank the Tesla stock price lately. No idea why though.

Also

‘He took to Twitter and tweeted a tweet.’

Should now be

‘He took to Xitter and xat a xit.’

The X being pronounced ‘sh’ every time.

Sorry, did you mean to reply to another comment? There is no reflection whatsoever to the comment you are replying to.

Edit: As this comment has whooshed at least 6 people:

it is very very very obvious that the article tries to manufacture outrage over one prediction model that is not publicised but avalable to the agency.

I pointed out that there is one other, equally good model unrestricted and there are about 20 other models that are equally not listed as restricted. Again, the restriction refers to publicising, not to government usage.

I hope this helps the understanding of crapwittyname@lemm.ee and his friends as I don’t think it makes sense to break this down simpler.

Sorry, what a shit, rage bait article is this?

… it was deemed in a National Hurricane Center (NHC) report [PDF] to be one of the two “best performers,” the other being a model called IVCN (Intensity Variable Consensus).

OK, what about IVCN? Is this available? We can assume it is as is not mentioned any more in the article. Also skimming the report it’s not like the other reports are wildly inaccurate/unusable.

Asked whether the NOAA deal affected the release of information about Hurricane Helene, Buchanan said, “HCCA is one of many computer models that forecasters use at the National Hurricane Center. NHC forecasters use a variety of model guidance, observations, and expert knowledge to develop the best and most consistent forecast, along with watches, warnings and other hazard information for use by the emergency management community, the public, and other core partners and decision makers.”

So the outrage is hot air over nothing. Got it.