Then it would be the main purpose of the drug
Actual answer is: this does happen, but then that becomes the reason to prescribe it.
Ozempic was a diabetes medication until the weight loss and addiction effects were observed.
Drugs are exactly that.
Viagra was a heart medication during trials, until they realized the heart benefits were minimal compared to the raging boners.
GLP-1 drugs were originally developed for diabetes. A side effect was weight loss.
Most drugs with fun side effects get marketed for the fun side effect.
Heroin was developed as a painkiller and cough remedy.
Nowadays it’s only sold for the fun side effects.
Probably 3/4 of the people I know on GP1s are either reporting mental health/addiction benefits, or are taking it exclusively for that reason. Helped me quit weed, helping a friend of mine quit vaping right now. Shuts off my gut-wrenching anxiety. I hate jumping on bandwagons but it’s a bit of a miracle drug, hopefully it doesn’t cause your DNA to turn inside out after 10 years or something.
Viagra was not originally made for what it’s mostly known for these days. Its effects on the male reproductive organ were a positive side effect.
Was here to say this. When ever they find out some unexpected benefit of a drug, they often invent a disorder and then offer up the treatment.
Things like erectile dysfunction are not really a disorder. It’s normal for men to find it more difficult to get and maintain an erection as they exit their 20s. And it will keep reducing.
Imagine if 50 year old men still walked around like 15 year old boys. My gawd. The world couldn’t survive.
Other drugs with invented dysfunctions.
Mail pattern baldness. Again natural and normal for men.
Eye lash thickness. Yes there is a prescription drug to treat your thin eye lashes.
There is a prescription sex drug for women. And here is the best part. It just makes women relaxed and sleepy. Yeah … so think about that.
Our society is fucked.
Natural changes as part of development being labeled as things that need treated.Treat those wrinkles.
Treat that hair loss.
Treat those thin eye lashes
Treat that flat ass syndrome
Side effect of the side effect of Viagra is blindness.
Aging sucks though.
I mean the body pain sucks. The loss of energy. Muscle tone.
But wrinkles ? Hair loss?
Our capitalistic culture decided it needed people to pay for vanity comforts. Have made it so people are depressed about natural changes that aren’t health related.
Makeup and cosmetic companies used to say you had to stay youthful and pretty or your husband would leave you for his young secretary. Now they tell you, you need lip filler and Botox at 25 "for yourself ". So you can feel good about yourself.
Bitch, please.
Propaganda to first make you feel like shit then offer you a solution that cost money.
And now we have women with swollen faces and lips everywhere, like some platypus fetish, and hair transplants look like shit once the rest of the hair thins out.
Because then it’s just an effect and the medication is sold as treating weight loss or memory or whatever
Yup, it starts off as an observed effect, then gets documented enough to where it shows up in studies, and then doctors are willing to prescribe it for “off label” use, then trials are run to rigorously test for that effect, until the medical health authorities agree that there’s a strong enough scientific basis to use as a treatment for that condition to where it is approved for that use.
Sometimes they do. Viagra was originally a heart medication that they figured out did something else.
Botox was for eye muscle disorders, now it’s used cosmetically, for migraines, and a bunch of other diseases.
Apparently 20% of drugs are prescribed off-label. It’s kind of an extension of “what do you call alternative medicine that works?”
Botox is the toxin in botulism that kills.
It’s right there in the name!
Wait, migraines? Are you able to give me (what would technically legally be non-medical) information on that? Migraines run in my family and every family that comes into contact with my little brother. Aside from the botulism poisoning method, how does that work?
It’s actually a labeled use nowadays. Just Google it on a burner phone (once advertised think you have migraines you’ll see nothing but migraine ads for months)
I get quarterly botox injections from my neurologist for my migraines. It’s 20+ little injections in my brow, jaw, neck, and shoulders. Before insurance would allow it, we had to try all other available treatments/medications, including a monthly at-home injection you give yourself. For me, at least, it’s been way better than the earlier treatments. I used to have 2-4 migraines per week at a pain around a 5 or 6 with a couple a year that would hurt more like an 8 or 9. Now I get 0-2 per week, usually no worse than a 3 on pain. It’s pretty common to go a few weeks without any, then just get one a week in the last month before my next injection.
Results vary a lot, probably because there are a lot of potential causes and even how we experience our migraines can vary so significantly. Efficacy can fade with time, too. But for me, at least, it’s held out for several years, and worked better than I or my doctor even expected.
Viagra also alleviates PMS. Not approved for it, even though it’s prescribed for recreation to men.
TIL 😀
However, the trial ended prematurely as investigators did not meet their sample size, so the funding was discontinued.
How? Why? This kind of study should be trivially easy to complete. The medication is already on the market, generics are super cheap, administration is super simple and non-invasive and I’d guess there are plenty of women suffering from PMS. That sounds like the kind of study that a grad student could pull off on a DIY budget.
According to Google, generics are ~€0.50 per dose and they administered a single dose per patient. Let’s say placebos cost the same as the generics, then the cost for these 25 participants was less than €15.
My only wild and reaching guess, beyond simple cruelty and hatred, is marketing was afraid of associating the drug with periods because “men would get grossed out” and potentially impact that share of the market.
Probably something like that… Sucks.
And it’s kinda stupid too. PMS is well known to not be conductive to female libido, and female libido is conductive to Viagra sales. So why not sell it to women too (=more sales) which might increase the occasions to sell it to men as well.
IDK if i have a partner i want them to be comfortable. Idk whether there’s just a lot of incels in powerful places or men have historically just hated the women they’re with. Either way that’s one reason I don’t identify as a man.
I mean a fair amount of my friends had endometriosis (not sure if that’s a geographic oddity or something worse) and now I’m curious if that could have (whole lot of hysterectomies in the gang) helped.
I mean if it would that’s just that much more infuriating…
But I’m not that knowledgeable on the difference between the impact of a cyst and the mechanism that gives cramps. My ex had endo. Miserable experience. I wish your friends the best in managing it.
Administered vaginally… “ooh I’m a bit crampy today! Time to pop a pussy pill”
Vaginal suppositories is common enough for eatrogen
Viagra will kill the shit out of you if you have a heart attack and the emergency room gives you nitroglycerin.
Well. Maybe you don’t die, but it won’t have the intended effect.
Maybe because then the drug manufacturers will have marketed it as a miracle drug and charge your soul for it.
Because people either don’t care about positive side effects, or it becomes an off-label/alternate use for the medication.
“May make you feel better” isn’t the kind of side-effect that someone would typically pay very much attention to, for example, unless it was meant for them to be aware of the possibility whilst their body adjusted to the new medication, and it would go back to normal after.
Oh, there are quite some. Just from the top of my heaf: Viagra originally was just a heart medication. Metformin, a diabetes 2 medication, is strongly suspected of having other positive side effects, like generally prolonging life. There recently was an article about a new Alzheimer medication which would be quick to the market as such because it is already a certified medication against something else.
Same with tirzepatide was used for a long time on diabetes 2 patients, but they realized it affected their hunger positively so it is now used as a weight loss drug.
Finasteride was designed to treat prostate cancer but it helps with male pattern baldness.
4% of finasteride users can’t get it up.
I lost a bit of weight when I went on ADHD meds
There is the question if this is caused directly by the medication, or if this is something caused by you eating better because ADHD is treated.
Yeah, could be. I eat to deal with boredom - probably a kind of ‘stimming’
Speed is fucking awesome, it makes me feel like a productive citizen.
Why are all these dishes in the sink ? That’s crazy! Let me clean this counter up ,it’ll only take 11 minutes then Im going to pay all my bills on time. Wow that was easy , now I won’t worry about all that crap and I’ll probably sleep like a baby tonight. I’m going to read a book for a little while then go to sleep
And here i am rawdogging the slog like a chump.
Cannabis is fantastic for some specific gut problems. Also some types of pain. Also nausea.
My pain doc was delighted when she found out I had all three. She said “go get stoned, never come back”
But gives you a drug addiction…
I think part of it is also that occasional positive side effects are not something drug companies can advertise. They’re legally obligated to talk about the negative ones.
But are they legally not allowed to talk about positive side effects?
Nope, just “tar” like stool and heart palpitations
They want to keep those under wraps so that they can repackage the drug, label it specifically for those effects, and mark it up another 5000%.
So the ones with real “feel good” side effects are the ones that people have addiction problems with, and instead of indirectly giving pleasure, they give it directly. Some people enjoy while they use them and move on with life, others become obsessed with that pleasure and throw everything else away in the pusuit of it.
Because they spin that off into separate drugs.
Wasn’t that the case with Ozempic? It was meant for diabetes patients first but then they noted the effect in reduced hunger and many other positive improvements which its why it has become as popular as it has
It was always a weight control drug, even for diabetics. I cannot believe people take that drug just for weight.
Same with Viagra. It’s actually a heart medication. It just happened to give guys boners.
Technically doesn’t give you a boner but inhibits the hormone that makes it harder to get a boner (e.g during your refractory period)
To get a boner you still need stimulation, physical or mental.
Why do I know this? My last relationship was very abusive and stressful. Even boner pills didn’t help much. When I got out of it, things started working again. The pills work best when you actually want to have sex with your partner, but still have issues.
It’s cuz they have so much love in their hearts now.
No, it has side effects, it’s popular because the public yearns for a diet pill that works and are willing to deal with the side effects
Are the side effects still oily uncontrollable shits or have they found better ones
Edit: I am available as an ointment consultant if it’s still the shits
The positive side effects are usually just the effects.
And the ones that aren’t are usually called “off-label”. ;)
I mean, usually the side effects have qualifiers like „Common: mild headaches“ „Very Rare: become a vessel for satan to roam the earth and sow chaos“. Wouldn’t it indeed be nice to have this for the positive effects too?
Normally if there are postive effects from a drug, they get studied further and re-marketed as such. If I remember correctly, Viagra was originally a medicine for heart conditions.
Would you rather a) die of your heart condition or b) always have a boner
and it’s used to manage pulmonary hypertension in infants.
Or at least not legally required to be listed to avoid liability.
