• Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ok Alito, so where’s your free speech protections for this case?

    The 11 year old bigot can wear a shirt that puts people down, but this person can’t express themselves online simply stating a fact about themselves?

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The conservatives on the supreme Court haven’t been consistent in decades. For then stare decises and judicial ethics are annoyances that should be ignored at all costs.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        stare decises

        Conservative “Justices:” Stare decides, that’s just like some famous painting or something right?

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        6 days ago

        Except it’s licensed by the state of Tennessee as an acceptable place to send your kids that won’t have them or you catching a truancy charge. Constitutional protections against government overreach apply to licensed agents of the state in a lot of other situations, not sure why this one should be different.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        True enough, I overlooked that aspect. Not sure how discrimination might play into it, but if it’s a private school then freedom of speech doesn’t apply :/