You shouldn’t have to wear safety rated glasses to protest, but I wouldn’t go to one without them at this point. If you normally wear glasses and they’re not rated an impact can shatter them and cause even more damage than not wearing them at all would have.
If you have glasses buy safety glasses that go over top of them. Doesn’t matter if your glasses are rated for it, use the safety glasses. Glasses are expensive and safety glasses can be bought for fairly cheap.
I hope they recover their vision. As someone who lost sight in one eye I can attest that going from binocular to monocular vision is life altering AND not considered a disability under the
lawSocial Security requirements but typically is covered by ADA.Edit: clarification.
How is losing 50% of your eyesight not a disability?
My dude, teeth are considered luxury bones in this country.
The protester was among tens of thousands of people who took to the streets for the demonstrations across Southern California and the rest of the country.
Tens of thousands? There were over FIVE MILLION protesters.
E OVER THIRTEEN MILLION protesters - thank you, Lucidlethargy
Over 12 million
Reminder to folks that “less lethal” still means “lethal” even if the cops pretend it doesn’t.
In the video from last weekend of the Australian reporter being shot in the back, you can clearly see the police officer behind her raise and aim straight at her. Clearly there’s no repercussions for misusing these weapons.
Different victim but here’s what a shot to the back can do:
I think he was hit with some kind of grenade the police fired. There seems to be a huge hole in the center. How is he not paralyzed??
That’s a big-ass bruise. If it was a hole, that man wouldn’t be standing.
Clearly there’s no repercussions for misusing these weapons.
Maybe in countries where police accountability isn’t a punchline.
It is this kind of thing that made me decide to ignore my city’s municipal codes regarding protest gear. It outlaws the wearing of bulletproof vests, helmets, protective visors, hearing protection, gas masks, and so on. To say the least, I cannot respect a law that is designed to permit bullies to injure or kill people who did nothing wrong.
Gods forbid that people should protect their faces from damage.
You expect me to believe that cops are supposed to 360 no scope trick shots? I don’t think they took, much less passed, geometry.
You’re supposed to be shooting at a dangerous crowd, not an individual. You don’t need to accurately get the right angle you just need to generally aim in the right direction, but at the ground, and I’ll bounce and hit someone. The fact they’re choosing not to do this either indicates poor training or malice.
Both. Malice inspired poor training.
Hundreds have been permanently blinded.
Just think about how that could even happen. You put any of us in their shoes, we would obviously aim low, to prevent permanent damage.
It’s like police are overgrown toddlers, mad that they’re forced to use less lethal rounds… So they take it out on civilians and aim for the face. Can you imagine being as hate-filled as these fucking orcs that you would want to blind the people you “serve” for the rest of their lives (if you don’t kill them)!? Absolute monsters…
‘Qualified immunity’ is unique to the USA. Never should have been made law and it should surprise no-one that it came about during push-back to the civil rights movement. It enables all of this bullshit by making police behaviour untouchable.
