The order was announced as White House officials believed they were nearing a deal for the app’s operations to be spun off into a new company based in the U.S. and owned and operated by a majority of American investors, with China’s ByteDance maintaining a minority position, according to a person familiar with the matter.

But Beijing hit the brakes on a deal Thursday after Trump announced wide-ranging tariffs around the globe, including against China. ByteDance representatives called the White House to indicate that China would no longer approve the deal until there could be negotiations about trade and tariffs, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive details of the negotiations.

  • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You could just stop reading the news if it bothers you so much instead of trying to interfere with other people’s first amendment right to rot their brains right out of their own skulls with Chinese propaganda or whatever they want

    Also, we should be more scared of our domestic oligarchs and the surveillance and propaganda machines they’ve been running on the American people

    Also also, if TikTok disappears tomorrow, China or their intermediaries can buy whatever data they want from third party data brokers that bundle datasets from a whole variety of businesses and organizations, because we basically don’t regulate any of this at all, because Congress doesn’t give a shit about our privacy, because it would cost their donors money if they did

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If we’re not going to ban it, we should stop talking about it and move on. If we are going to ban it, we should stop talking about it and do it. We do ourselves no favors by keeping it in the spotlight. It’d probably be tough for a ban to survive a challenge on First Amendment grounds (maybe following the example of Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U.S. 301 (1965)) but we live in stupid times so it’s not guaranteed.

      As for our home-grown (or imported, in certain notable cases) technological Peeping Toms, at least there’s a chance that they could be held accountable. It’d rely on people in power actually growing a pair and giving a fraction of a fuck about their constituents so I’m not holding my breath but they’re not as out of reach as a Beijing bug factory.