• Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

    I mean that’s not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing…

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that’s what this ruling is about, it says Apple can’t prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn’t doing that with Steam afaik, actually I’m not aware of any other platform that does this

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever

          That’s pretty open I’d say

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Lol, as long as you properly plan in advance and coordinate such a thing, not the way that uh… Dead Matter tried to do it.

            Dear god what a fustercluck.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        They literally do not lol

        In game purchases in steam games don’t have to pay Valve, nor does Valve prevent you from uploading your game to other stores, which is what this ruling was about.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

        It’s one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it’s a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev’s pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

        • Greercase@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the “purchase” is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn’t incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It’s already a fee anyway.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I have many issues with the gamer deference to the steam monopoly… But they don’t partake in this particular abuse: taking a cut from the dev for all in game purchases. They only take a (sizeable) cut for the initial game purchase.