• BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    And yet he still charges 30% to list on steam…

    He could move it all to a non profit like blender and charge creators a reasonable price if he cared about the industry or players.

    He’s just as profit minded as any billionaire. He’s just using Linux contributions to solidify their monopoly on pc gaming.

    • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I don’t disagree with the 30% being too much. That said, Steam often provides more than just a sales pages for the fee, they always provide server access for multiplayer and cloud saving. That has to get covered somehow. I also believe in celebrating the good things going and there really aren’t many of those in the gaming market these days, certainly not in the AAA-money tier. I’m going to enjoy the wins we get. If you don’t want to do that, enjoy being miserable, I guess.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        More entrenching of their services as a monopoly. Without a doubt the cost of a sales page and servers would be less than 30% of a lot of games sales. It’s a cost they are willing to pay if it means keeping their walled garden and 30% flat rate. (Like Sony selling consoles at a loss)

        Any open source Linux contributions from steam (proton) are welcome because it’s not tied into their monopoly and people can use them freely.

        You can enjoy the small victories while also being aware of future outcomes from these corporate giants.