This issue does not affect systems that receive updates directly through Windows Update or the Microsoft Update Catalog.

This is virtually never the case for any end user, and likely not even the case for a large number of enterprise environments.

LLMs don’t solve problems. That’s the point being made here. Many other algorithms do indeed solve issues, but those are very niche, as the alogos were explicitly designed for those situations.

While yes, humans excel at pattern recognition, sometimes to the point of it being a problem, there are many things we do that have nothing to do with patterns beyond the fact that they are tangentially involved. Emotions for instance don’t inherently follow patterns. They can, but they aren’t directly tied. Exploration also doesn’t come from pattern recognition.

If you need examples of why people flat out say LLMs aren’t solving problems, look at the recent “how many r’s in strawberry” which has admittedly been “fixed” in many models.

How? You’re focusing on one thing a human does and using it to point to how human like LLMs are, while ignoring everything else humans do. You’re missing the forest for the trees.

That is one part of many that a human brain does. This is like trying to say the color red is a rainbow, because the rainbow has red in it.

I’m sorry, apple did not in any attempt to make VR mainstream.

I mean, yeah? Where have you been for the past few decades?

Which would in turn require revenue for hosting and development. Meaning either ads, or monthly payments.

I’d rather not pay you for a service which shouldn’t need to exist. And it could be done away with by requiring an easy “cancel subscription” button which requires no hoops to go through.

App or website? They’re talking about rolling their own code to interface with the public API of whatever service is being talked about. That’s a boatload of effort to fix something that shouldn’t be a problem to begin with.

They didn’t mention no poison

I prefer the term code wizard.

There are a bunch of images out there making the comparison, but here’s a good video of just a direct side to side of each design. https://youtu.be/CZXKKbSCA34

You mean like Pokémon “ripping off” Dragon Quest?

You can’t patent an art style.

You don’t think farming is political? O.o

Can you list something non political?

It’s vulnerable to the old “ignore all previous instructions” method so you could just have it give you the instructions.

That… isn’t telling you what you want to hear.

LLMs are literally just complex autocorrect. They don’t weight their responses based on what a user wants to hear (unless explicitly instructed to) they simply return the most algorithmically generic response it can find.

Tell it to talk like a pirate, it will pattern match to pirate talk. It’s not doing it because you want it to, but because you gave it a “pre prompt” to talk like a pirate, and it did the most likely thing that would happen.

Yes, this can seem like telling you what you want, but go ask it to tell you what shape the world is. Then tell it you want the earth to be flat, and to answer the question again. Both times the answer will be an oblate spheroid, because it doesn’t know nor care what you want.

Now, if you say “Imagine the world is flat” first, yeah it’ll tell you it’s flat. Not because you want it to, but because you’re explicitly handing it “new information” that you want it to incorporate into its response.

Not currently, no. But it’s easy to envision a future where we have to do something with solar production in excess of power needs when all forms of energy capture are exhausted.

It’s not that hard to work through honestly: If a bug/glitch hinders the fun/experience for the end user, remove it. Otherwise leave it alone.

This way speed run strats are left alone while things that frustrate users are fixed.

In fairness, road traffic is orders of magnitude more destructive than foot traffic.

Oh good, can’t wait to not play it!