FCUK SHITSOFT
FUCK GITHUB
Maga of development.
STOP USING THEIR STUPID FUCKING SERVICE
Not because the lack of alternateves, even from the EU
https://alternativeto.net/software/github/?license=opensource&origin=eu
Why not codeberg?
^please ^donate
Codeberg took down my torrent projects I put on there. They cited german anti-piracy laws as the reason.
Not saying they’re not better than github of course, but they aren’t the real solution and will comply fully with german law. The solution decentralized issue tracking via forgejo or something.
Missed opportunity to say “Why not Codeberg?”
Why not Codeberg?
Fixed
This has been in the article though, among other alternatives.
Woosh.
We really need something like https://forgefed.org/ !
Running all our own forgejo instance is well and good but this the strengh of github is not in it’s feature but rather it’s because it offer the largest platform. Using a federation protocol would allow users to contribute without needing one account per instances.
Maybe something like radicle?
one of my things with the federation is I would like a login to be able to be used with different things. log into peertube with lemmy credentials and such.
To be honest, I’m starting to drink the Sourcehut coolaid here. We have a distributed method of interacting with repositories: Email.
Don’t get me wrong, the current user experience of email-based patches and discussion isn’t great because it’s too easy to send a badly formatted patch. But if we invested time in making email patches easier to use (e.g. sending them through a web ui for people who prefer github style PRs) then we could skip all the architectural pains of solutions like forgefed.
I don’t know if email is a good solution. Having contributed to the linux kernel ( in 2010ish ) may have distorted my perception of the gitmail workflow but it doesn’t seems very accesible and i can’t possibly see a change allowing this to be usable by semi-technical users.
The change would be using Gitmail as the plumbing, and normalising the creation of user-friendly porcelain on top.
E.g. suppose there is a repo foo/bar hosted by a forgejo instance at myinstance.org/foo/bar. Sending an email to foo.bar@myinstance.org (or similar) could automatically create a PR and, conversely, opening a PR could send a patch series to the foo/bar mailing list.
Github has really turned to shit. Almost every time I try to search for something I get the too many requests error even if it’s the first time I’ve visited the site in a week.
It would be nice if people could self host something like Forgejo, but the damn AI crawlers will just hammer your server until it crashes. The crawlers are really hard to block without relying on another big tech company like Cloudflare.
It’s hard to host anything public without relying on something like cloudflare.
But, what makes you say it’s “ai crawlers” rather than conventional botnets and so on? Very few organisations have the resources to train large ai models, but the resources needed to run a botnet or something are much lower.
Because the 1000 requests/10 minutes on my server are done by AmazonBot, mostly. Followed by ASNs from Huawei, Azure and the like.
If big tech are the issue, then try this robots.txt (yes on github…): https://github.com/ai-robots-txt/ai.robots.txt
My issue is with the scrapers pretending to be something they aren’t. Tens of thousands of requests, spread over IPs, mostly from China and Singapore but increasingly from South America.
AmazonBot follows
robots.txt. I don’t so what Huawei and Azure ASNs have to do with it - that sounds like those requests simply come from inside a Huawei and an Azure network, respectively, but could otherwise be anything.
The botnets usually try to login to SSH and pages like phpmyadmin & wp-admin looking for something they can infect rather than scraping every single page on a website frequently. Unless you do something to become the target of a DDoS attack or don’t secure your server, they usually aren’t much more than a source of log spam.
He just repeats what he heard elsewhere, he doesn’t really understand what the words mean, just fancy text prediction
It is really easy to mirror git repos though, which makes this less of an issue than most other monopolies
Projects lose things like issue tracking, discussions which are not git features.
True, but filling bugs, making pull requests, reviewing them and links to between projects ports much worse between forges.
To be fair, I think that is mostly a failure of git to take in these features to free them from the forges. Maybe radicle had a chance of fixing that, but…
deleted by creator
