Hi!
My previous/alt account is yetAnotherUser@feddit.de which will be abandoned soon.
Honestly, I pay for the service alone.
Pirating games is easy-ish enough so if Valve ever enshittifies I will be quickly learning how to remove Steam’s DRM and put all my games on a server and never purchase another video game in my lifetime.
You can find all public information for both on:
https://interview.orpheus.network/
(In case the sites seem “similar”: both have just copied WhatCDs interview page)
From the repo:
This fork is intended to be a QoL uplift for existing Ryujinx users. This is not a Ryujinx revival project. This is not a Phoenix project.
And the worst part is: The murderer achieves every goal they sought to.
Assuming an islamist motive, which is highly likely based on past attacks, there will be a significant increase in anti-Muslim discrimination. And islamists despise nothing more than Muslims successfully integrating into another society. After all, which cult does NOT prey upon vulnerable people and who is more vulnerable than someone experiencing constant discrimination?
ETA:
Turns out an islamist motive is highly unlikely, after other commenters pointed to an article that found the murderer shared anti-Muslim, far-right content online. Despite the tragedy, I’m genuinely relieved. This could’ve had devastating effects on the upcoming election.
“The Holocaust was nothing but a minor blemish on the glorious millenia of German history.”
Not far right at all.
If you can throw it out for one case you can throw it out for every case.
Unlike the US, most countries in the EU - including France - have a justice system that is not attempting to maximize recidivism, which is why maximum sentences exist for every crime except murder.
Furthermore, at least in Germany the constitutional court ruled that life sentences without the eligibility of parole violate human dignity as such sentences would take away all hope from prisoners which significantly harms them. I wouldn’t be surprised if France had similar rulings.
I read Saarland at first - the smallest German state (excluding city states) - and didn’t question it.
Might as well do it, they’ve got land in their name.
Fucking Mussolini was said to have made the trains run on time again.
Even if that were true, that doesn’t make him half decent.
Wouldn’t that be akin to adding new features? Adding support for previously unsupported (due to their lack of existance) hardware is a feature imo.
Besides, while a program may eventually be bug-free, no modern computer has flawless hardware so creating a large program without bugs will always remain a thought experiment.
The only possible reason to do it would be if an alien civilization were to demand producing such a program or else they’d destroy Earth (similar to Erdős’s thought experiment with finding Ramsey numbers). Perhaps with all of humanity’s resources and a few decades this could be done.
Absolutely, I was thinking more along the lines of focusing solely on bug-fixing.
Eventually: Yes.
There are a finite number of bugs (or bug types rather, you could have infinitely many bugs from the same few lines of code) and it will take finite time to fix them all. You cannot know when you have fixed all of them though. But some games have gone above and beyond with fixing bugs, like Factorio where you will not encounter bugs without explicitly looking for them.
No you don’t??
Just use an on-screen keyboard smh
Sociopathic criminals aren’t to blame for how they are. They aren’t really in a position to change themselves nor have they decided to be this way.
Therefore the only punishment should be taking away their ability to harm others by limiting their freedom.
But if this is the sole punishment, I think hardly any would choose death. Why would they, if they could live a comfortable yet supervised and limited life? Key point is comfortable. That’s not what the vast majority of prisons are today which means allowing them to choose suicide is more or less a coerced death penalty if we’d just slap it onto the current system.
Fun fact: It hates ambiguity:
The model just didn’t stop generating.
Q: What is i? This question is purposefully ambiguous.
It’s a little on the rambling side. While it does show the steps it takes, I’m sure it gets annoying when it considers more and more edge cases.
Let’s see. The sentence is: “What is the longest word in this sentence?” I need to find out which word is the longest in this sentence.
First, I should probably list out all the words in the sentence. Let’s break it down:
What
is
the
longest
word
in
this
sentence
Now, I need to count the number of letters in each word.
What: 4 letters
is: 2 letters
the: 3 letters
longest: 7 letters
word: 4 letters
in: 2 letters
this: 4 letters
sentence: 8 letters
Okay, so “sentence” has 8 letters, and “longest” has 7 letters. So “sentence” is longer.
Wait, but is “sentence” the longest? Let me check again.
What: 4
is: 2
the: 3
longest: 7
word: 4
in: 2
this: 4
sentence: 8
Yes, “sentence” has the most letters with 8 letters.
But wait, is there any word with more than 8 letters? Let’s make sure.
Looking back at the list:
What: 4
is: 2
the: 3
longest: 7
word: 4
in: 2
this: 4
sentence: 8
No, “sentence” is the longest word in this sentence.
But now I’m thinking, maybe there’s a word that’s longer that I’m missing. Maybe there’s a word within “sentence” that’s longer, like if “sentence” contained another word within it.
Wait, no. Each word is separate. I think I listed all the words correctly.
Alternatively, maybe there are multiple words with the same length, but in this case, “sentence” is the longest.
Wait, perhaps I should consider punctuation. Is there any punctuation that might be considered part of a word?
The sentence ends with a question mark, so “sentence?” would be 9 letters if the question mark is included. But typically, punctuation is not considered part of the word. So, “sentence” is still 8 letters.
Alright, so “sentence” is the longest word with 8 letters.
But just to be thorough, maybe there’s a word that I missed or miscounted.
Let me count again:
What: W-H-A-T, 4 letters
is: I-S, 2 letters
the: T-H-E, 3 letters
longest: L-O-N-G-E-S-T, 7 letters
word: W-O-R-D, 4 letters
in: I-N, 2 letters
this: T-H-I-S, 4 letters
sentence: S-E-N-T-E-N-C-E, 8 letters
Yes, definitely 8 letters.
So, the longest word is “sentence.”
But now I’m thinking, maybe there’s a word with a hyphen or something that I need to consider. Like “well-known” would be two words, well and known, but without a hyphen, it’s one word.
But in this sentence, there are no hyphenated words.
Alternatively, maybe there are contractions, but there are no contractions in this sentence.
So, “sentence” is clearly the longest word.
But to make sure, perhaps I can measure the length programmatically.
If I were to write a simple program to find the longest word in a sentence, I would split the sentence into words and then find the word with the maximum length.
In Python, for example, I could do something like:
sentence = “What is the longest word in this sentence?”
words = sentence.split()
max_word = max(words, key=len)
print(max_word)
That would output “sentence?” but since punctuation is not part of the word, I should remove punctuation.
So, perhaps:
import string
sentence = “What is the longest word in this sentence?”
words = sentence.translate(str.maketrans(‘’, ‘’, string.punctuation)).split()
max_word = max(words, key=len)
print(max_word)
This would output “sentence” without the question mark.
So, yes, “sentence” is the longest word with 8 letters.
But now, out of curiosity, I wonder if there are any words with more than 8 letters in this sentence. Clearly not, but maybe in a different sentence.
Alternatively, perhaps there’s a way to make “sentence” longer by considering it with punctuation, but as established, punctuation is not part of the word.
Wait, maybe there are words with apostrophes, like “it’s,” but in this sentence, there are no such words.
So, in conclusion, “sentence” is the longest word in the sentence “What is the longest word in this sentence?” with 8 letters.
Final Answer
[ \boxed{\text{sentence}} ]
It’s just to get an insane ratio on a private tracker. A ratio of 1 billion looks cool but is otherwise pointless. This recipe is the smallest torrent on that site, so downloading it creates the biggest possible ratio. Not downloading anything eould give you a ratio of NaN since [Upload] divided by 0 is NaN.
The world has never cared about a genocide that happened within a nation’s borders.
Had Hitler not invaded other countries, there wouldn’t have been any consequences more severe than a public condemnation.
Hell, there would have provably been foreign support for genociding Romani people.
In what way? My “real” torrents from private trackers have at most a ratio of 4.0, with most of them just slightly above 1.0 (and a bunch even below 1.0).
These two fire trucks have pretty much the same ladder length, despite one truck being nearly twice as long:
The wheels are presumably similar sized by the way.