• iopq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We want landlords to do this to serve the renters that want to pay more. Office spaces will be renovated to make apartments when rents are high enough to pay for this expense. You don’t need a plan when market forces cause people to make sound business decisions.

    The only thing you need to fix is zoning

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That assumes market forces are doing what you want. There are always levers that can encourage the market to move where you want it to go. For example raising property taxes but giving a 10 year tax break to converted office spaces (and changes to zoning of course).

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That makes markets less efficient in the long run. It might cost less in rent, but your office is far away and you pay for it in commute time. You didn’t even know that in a parallel universe your company moved to a better office space that’s in your city

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Efficiency and resilience are opposing forces. Think of the spare tire on a car. Is it efficient to carry around a fifth wheel all the time? No. But it is resilient because it will make it possible to quickly recover from a disruption (i.e. a flat tire).

          The housing system needs a certain degree of resilience or people end up homeless. If that costs landlords money, too damn bad. It’s the job of government to force them.