• lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        the proportions are off and the lines are crooked. there’s also the typical latent noise on places like the controller buttons.

        • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Sorry, none of this is a clear indicator of AI. The “latent noise” you refer to is perfectly consistent with compression and resizing artifacting and noise. Proportions are often off when making “chibi” icon-sized consoles, but notably, they are consistently or coherently off. Other features are strongly suggestive it isn’t AI. For example:

          • All of the controllers have consistent layouts, including the correct number and orientation of buttons, player indicators, etc (e.g., the Wii controllers).
          • Consistent diagonal step effects, even if blurred from poor resizing (see the PS4).
          • Consistent text for all system indicators that is legible without AI artifacting, even if blurred from poor resizing.
          • The fact that the 360 and PS3 (didn’t notice initially) are not even pixel art suggests they just grabbed random icons from the web, not ran them through AI generators.
          • Tattorack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            Visual Capitalist says they make all their own graphics (so not just grabbed from the Web) from a “veriaty of tools from Adobe Creative Cloud”.

            Adobe has been making a huge push for so-called “AI tools” in their Creative Cloud service.

            • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Ok - Yes, Adobe does have insidiously integrated AI tools. But again, nothing you point to here is strongly indicative of AI, and again, just consistent with sloppy & lazy resizing (which you could just as likely see pre-2020, before AI). Adobe also has a very extensive stock library which may be where these came from.

              There are some really hard to spot AI generated materials possible now, but the sloppy inconsistency here is - conversely - an indicator that they don’t care much what we do or don’t notice so wouldn’t be spending the time to generate something with all of the consistent details (see list above). Instead, the consistent details suggest human-created versions based on the real systems.