It is unclear if Trump administration backs deal that would mean Kyiv giving up territory and slashing size of military

US and Russian officials have quietly drafted a new plan to end the war in Ukraine that would require Kyiv to surrender territory and severely limit the size of its military, it was reported on Wednesday as Russian drone and missile strikes killed at least 25 people in the city of Ternopil.

The draft plan, which was reportedly developed by Donald Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the Kremlin adviser Kirill Dmitriev, would force draconian measures on Ukraine that would give Russia unprecedented control over the country’s military and political sovereignty. The plan is likely to be viewed as surrender in Kyiv.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    As an outsider looking in, I feel that Ukraine is clearly winning this war. There is no value in accepting the ‘plan’ of a false ally.

    A peace plan drafted by NATO sans the United States would make much more sense, because they would have to deal with the fallout if they made Versailles Treaty v2.0.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    So the US idea of a “peace plan” is the capitulation of Ukraine and preparing Russia to take what is left in five years time?

    • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well trumps plan but everyone already knew that. If the Democrats would have won the last election, it probably would have went in a totally different direction. The Democrats are more aligned with the European countries. The Republicans with the oil producing countries and authoritarians.

  • respectmahauthoritybrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Anyone outside of the of the US privileged goons who thought “gaza is not my problem” will soon realized what happened there isnt just a conflict, but a total annihilation of the supposed “international law”

    Any country is now free to do whatever the fuck it wants if it can “donate” or “flatter” the rogue state of United states enough… Fuck russia israel and the US, and even the EU which keeps supporting these murdererers under the guise of “neutrality”

    Have fun as we head back to a world where borders are divided by force and u can get wipes out because of following the wrong ideology or being the wrong ethnicity

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    If Russia ends up winning after all this… all around depressing and sets a very serious precedent.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Honestly, though, this has happened throughout all of human civilization. It’s only now that people think it’s generally a bad thing. In the past, you either didn’t care, suffered it, or celebrated the conquest.

      • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        True, I’ve never heard about stories from the past complaining about bad people doing bad things.

        It’s not like the epic of Gilgamesh, one of humanities oldest surviving stories is in the beginning about the overreach and tyranny of a narcissistic king.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          All things that suck and are part of human nature. Sadly most people seem unable to grow past their primal urges.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Where did you gather that I’m ok with that? What a strange comment. One can view history through a neutral lens.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              There’s an entire field of study called “History” and people are trained to do just that. YOU, specifically, want otherwise. Don’t project that on other people.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      Russia is desperate, their only leverage these days is oil and nukes. They won’t nuke anything because they’ll get nuked back immediately and hit again with third strike weapons. Ukraine is effectively hammering their oil distribution and production and this Russia is losing leverage.

    • rayyy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would make zero difference. Putin will continue to take more Ukraine soil.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    3 days ago

    Trump works for Putin. Even when he says he’s mad at Putin, he still is in his employ (or being blackmailed).

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Trump would consider himself as a peace maker, but this would essentially dismantle NATO as it currently is. Nobody would base their security on unstable US.