• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No, that’s not what novel ideation is whatsoever 🤦

    Again…these models work from a list of boundaries, logic, and rules made by humans. They don’t make it up themselves because…they.fucking.cant.

    If they could make their own rules and conclusions without human intervention, then you have novel ideas. But…they.100%.FUCKING.CANT.DO.THAT.

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Okay, let me posit one more question to you. Please define novel ideation in technical terms.

    • markon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I notice you got real quiet about the math part. I guess realizing you think protein folding is a list of 100 items was too embarrassing to address. Ignoring it doesn’t make you look smarter. And now you are frantically moving the goalposts. You claim it’s only “novel” if it invents the rules from scratch? By that definition, a human author never has a novel idea because they are just using grammar rules taught by a teacher. Also: AlphaGo Move 37. The AI played a move that human masters explicitly said was “wrong” based on human strategy. It defied the logic conventions it was fed and won. That is the literal definition of forming a conclusion independent of, and superior to, human intervention. But please, use more periods between your words. It definitely covers up the fact that you don’t know what you’re talking about.