Jesus, WOW

Then why if you aren’t familiar would you make a comment you didn’t see anything?

Do you randomly walk into other people’s jobs with zero proficiency and speak to how they’re doing at it?

Here’s a very simple list of issues that any Node dev would immediately say is generated and has not been cleaned up:

• package.json
• knip (check that tab usage)
• WILDLY fucking stupid Dockerfile
• What directory am I in here??? Note the dupe code because whatever shit tool lost track
• What in the absolute fuck?

I mean I can keep going, but if you even glanced at this and didn’t IMMEDIATELY get it, you are bad at your job.

Edit: This one is fucking hilarous

Lolwut??? Did you check the GitHub at all?

Check the code

This is so vibecoded 🤣 Nawthx

Red Hat is the largest funder of the Fedora Projects because it serves as a base for other things they make and support aside from their enterprise distros. Being the largest single funder gets you the most pull on the direction of said projects. They also have Red Hat employees directly running or contributing to various projects and upstream commits.

The actual community boards and such are independent of Red Hat otherwise. Similar to how Valve suddenly has a bunch of pull in the direction of the projects they’ve been directly funding and contributing to the past few years, Red Hat informs the independent community board with commits and contributions.

This is how the FOSS community works in general though. ‘Project A’ could be widely used in the community, but generally have fairly slow development. ‘Company A’ comes in and offers to fund feature development or big hunts, or maybe directly contribute fixes because they rely on this project. That project then either has the choice to turn down that extra help that could greatly benefit the project, or take that help, and as part of that deal, accept that ‘Company A’ now has some pull in the direction of the project.

Kind of a majority rule via resource commitment.

Logs

Logs

Get a better job so you can afford better drugs. This is “Minimum Wage Methy”, and you want to be “Salaried Methy”.

And literally everything else can do it better.

But at least you got that.

😘

No. Just…no.

The failure rate is going to be absolute INSANE as well.

I didn’t miss it, but didn’t loop back. Apologies.

I disregarded that as a solution in my response to that, because it’s not really a solution to OP’s request. Yes, they are cheaper. No, they are not functional for this need due to lack of PCIe. Running SSDs on these devices is not a feature because of the bus speed and connection limitations.

Sure it’s possible. No, it’s not functional for the needs requested here, or even a good suggestion. If somebody wanted a RELIABLE backup target using SSDs, this is the last possible scenario I would even suggest, and only if working from a box of scraps.

I’m not discounting your point that it’s cheaper at all, but it’s like…okay…if someone asked me where to get steak, because they need steak for a recipe they are cooking for dinner, my response shouldn’t be “Well, you could get steak right there, but it costs $X, and you can get Chicken wayyyyyyyy over there. It’s not beef, and it’s not what your recipe calls for, but it’s cheaper and possible to get.”

You’re asserting a position into justification for an argument that doesn’t exist. OP isn’t asking what they could theoretically run backups to. That could be an esp32 board for even cheaper. It’s also an even worse solution than an RPi. It’s just not what they’re asking for is my point.

This ONLY works at an insane scale. This will never hit the consumer market.

Again…I think you’re just missing the point here and trying to justify a worse solution without cause. A cheaper, more functional solution exists already. Trying to assert “you don’t need this or that” is not useful.

If I went to a car dealership and they told me a newer model of a car I wanted was in stock for $X, I’m not going to say “Okay,bsure, but I want the shitter version, and I’ll pay more for it.”

Makes zero sense.

Gotta say… This is not how you’d generally do any of this. Where you get this info?

Then something has changed about the local deployment and concentration of the network near you. Don’t know what to tell ya 🤷

As long as the provider is the same, and your instances are using properly using DoH or DoT, you have nothing to worry about.

If you’re super concerned though, I’d be using Mullvad over Cloudflare though. Just saying.

See my other response. This is quite normal.

Yes, that’s called Round-Robin Load Balancing.

To get more specific, your DNS provider spins up a large number of DNS resolvers out in the world on a CDN network that resolves clients to the most geographically convenient server(s) at any point in time based on the GeoIP info of your public IP.

Once you resolve one set of addresses at any given time, it caches your request, so the next time you ask these DNS servers for something you’ll get a response right back from them as fast as possible.

You constantly checking is just going to show this. It’s quite normal.