This could be huge for vehicle design as a whole.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What is the point in a $37,000 bike with SS battery and 600km of range. ICE bikes get about 200km a tank. No one rides 600km a day on a naked sport bike. If the point of SS batteries is fast charging , then why carry around 33 KWhr of overpriced battery?

    This is a bike designed by non motorcyclists and marketed on numbers. 1000nm instant torque? That’s unrideable. 3.5 sec 0-60 is not fast for a motorcycle, so their math doesn’t even make sense. It’s just a bunch of numbers. 200kw charging? Who cares, and good luck finding a charger that will do that.

    Every premium price EV bike company has gone broke.

    • Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think the bike exists to sell the battery. I’m getting a strong feeling there is no intention for the bike to be profitable, but rather as a proof that what they’re selling works by showcasing a real-world model that people can buy and drive.

      With their plans to out-scale Tesla in battery manufacturing, it seems to me that they’re hoping to capture deals with EV manufacturers.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Don’t worry, there’s no way it’ll do 600km outside of a perfect lab test. 200 km is more likely, maybe 300.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Your points are valid but those chargers are very common, probbaly the most common where I am. There are 400kw chargers cropping up too.

      Also I would hope that the range is so high to allow for the inevitable failure to achieve the stated range.

      But yeah everything else is laugh worthy