• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The most controversial part of the plan is likely to revolve around the pricing of medical data, which experts have warned will fuel public concern over profiteering from private medical information.

    NO SHIT SHERLOCK. Because it is profiteering from private medical information!


    Unrelated but interesting: Financial Times doesn’t like you copying and pasting text from their site and when you paste copied text, they’ve added something extra there. This is what it looked like when I pasted the small bit of text I copied for the quote:

    Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

    https://www.ft.com/content/9ec787a8-60d5-4899-8223-81335dfa919b

    The most controversial part of the plan is likely to revolve around the pricing of medical data, which experts have warned will fuel public concern over profiteering from private medical information.

    Well go fuck yourself, Financial Times, I don’t like people who think it’s okay to slap some shit into my clipboard that I didn’t actually copy. That’s shady fucking shit,hijacking my copy/paste.

    It’s just fucking greed all the way down, isn’t it?