

I certainly see where you’re coming from; there’s a difference though.
Charlie Kirk was fighting to overturn the social contract; he didn’t think the country has to accommodate LGB (and especially T) folks, atheists, Muslims, leftists, single women, et cetera. Hell, he loved political violence directed against Democrats.
People who break the social contract should not be surprised when they lose its protection.
The very first thing he says is the most damning.
He wanted to use the death penalty against the people who stood up to Trump’s fascist insurrection.
Dude got what he earned.