

Didn’t First Nations people get messed over for these?
Shattering the mirror doesn’t change what is reflected.


Didn’t First Nations people get messed over for these?


I’m not going to argue against any of that. The least wealthy should have access to sports, theatre, symphony, art exhibition, both as participants and spectators, once basic needs are met. Clothing even. The same factories producing the most expensive goods produce the least expensive, and those factory workers and society can benefit from it as much as the designer slapping a label, ostentatious or subtle, and fire exits can be unblocked. If needs on the lowest level of Maslow’s heirarcy of needs remain unmet, that’s the starting point, then onward and upward. People in Iran and California should absolutely have clean drinking water, unpolluted earth for food production. Tuna and sea turtles deserve a clean, cool enough to survive habitat. Air should be breathable. The world is abundant enough to meet every need; but not every greed.


Humiliation is dehumanization, a terrorist tactic.


but there is still some market capitalism and profit to be had to assume risk and investment
When socialism assumes the risk, it’s because that product serves s need in a society. It would seem outside of that (legitimate need), it’s a want that drives mindless and destructive consumerism, from my perspective. I can’t think of any product or service outside that scope, but I’m listening.


For example, there are signs that more lower-income households are investing in the stock market than a decade ago.


Another reason to live in taxpayer paid military bunkers behind guarded gates.


Good luck, Canada!


It’s a dystopian government’s dream.
ICC can issue warrants. Afaik, contract waiving legal requirements are null and void. I know it requires states to actually uphold the law and detain the accused, but empires fall.
They should tell them how they’re harming property.