• ceiphas@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Isn’t it abuse if i take a picture of a girl, let grok remove the clothes and post this online?

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s a crime, but it’s not the same crime as taking the actual clothes off the actual girl. She was not physically abused. She was not even involved.

      • ceiphas@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        She will be, if some asshat sees the pic and takes it for real and thinks she is OK with bring raped because the loses naked (there are enough asshats that have that mindset)

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Congratulations on the worst take in a competitive field.

          Just… what the fuck? What is it about this distinction that makes people lose all sense? ‘Hey bearing in mind we’re still talking about criminal creeping on children, it’s important to remember that actual touching is worse than doodling over images, so let’s not dilute a term specifically f–’ ‘There is no difference between fiction and reality because what if a crazy person couldn’t tell fiction from reality?!’

          Get help.

      • Maestro@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        When all her friends and family see that image, she is definitely involved. And it’s definitely abuse.

            • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              The central goddamn point.

              Depicting things happening does not mean they actually happened.

              The entire point of the term CSAM is to describe crimes which literally occurred. It is material… from the sexual abuse… of children. Do y’all not understand why it’s kinda fuckin’ important to have a term for that specific concept?

                • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  How often do I have to say this is still a crime before y’all stop having a different argument inside your heads?

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Abuse doesn’t have to by physical you stupid fucking piece of shit.

        See? My words didn’t even touch you.