• callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A large building with a lot of rentals would be taxed at a high total value, and this increased cost would be passed on to renters, thereby defeating the purpose. It should o ly apply to unrented properties.

    Side note, I know nothing about rent control though.

    • rushmonke@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      and this increased cost would be passed on to renters

      Wrong. Renters are already paying the most the market will bear.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In many places residential is already taxed less but you are right it would likely have a negative effect at high density. My guts says it would push more toward the 4 over 2’s that are already prevelent due to their cost vs return. Possibly rentals would get assesed like condos and then added together. I could see that.