• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      My other reply to you was literally entirely composed of a supporting link. Quit being disingenuous.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        And I told you, you posted a link to classic liberalism. It is a subset of liberalism it is not liberalism

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      No. We’re right. You’ve been given references. Just because you obstinantly ignore those references does not make you correct or smart.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No I’m right I gave references, nobody has provided anything that has shown that liberalism is right

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They gave references, you ninny. It doesn’t matter if you have references if everyone is bringing a lot more of rhem in to it, which they have.

          Again, obstinance should not be confused with being correct. That’s just being in denial… You are in denial.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            What reference. The only one was a link to something I had already shared and it linked to the one area of liberalism that is considered center or center right. So let me know which link I’d love to know