Date of 4 June remains one of China’s strictest taboos, with government using increasingly sophisticated tools to censor its discussion

There is no official death toll but activists believe hundreds, possibly thousands, were killed by China’s People’s Liberation Army in the streets around Tiananmen Square, Beijing’s central plaza, on 4 June 1989.

The date of 4 June remains one of China’s strictest taboos, and the Chinese government employs extensive and increasingly sophisticated resources to censor any discussion or acknowledgment of it inside China. Internet censors scrub even the most obscure references to the date from online spaces, and activists in China are often put under increased surveillance or sent on enforced “holidays” away from Beijing.

New research from human rights workers has found that the sensitive date also sees heightened transnational repression of Chinese government critics overseas by the government and its proxies.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    Never forget when the CIA organised an armed color revolution which resulted into people shooting at the Chinese military. The clashes outsider of the square, not on it as the name suggests, resulted in a total of around 300 deaths.

    Tiananmen has to be the dumbest propaganda pount because it is so incredibly easy to debunk for anyone who has basic access to a search machine. The CIA literally admitted they backed the riots.

    The sheer hypocrisy of posting this while the American government is arming a live streamed genocide with over 60.000, likely more than 200.00p killed.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, everything bad is the CIA’s fault! A one-party dictatorship would never violently suppress dissent, and anyone saying otherwise is a paid shill!

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        “Students” hahaha. Nice of you to leave out that the rioters started attacking the police first and literally burned police officiers alive. The peaceful protesters at the square were not attacked.

        There are actual events you can point to in which China represses their population. This is probably the dumbest one because extreme restraint was shown from the Chinese authorities.

        If it was America the guy blocking the tank from leaving the square would have been run over. And you would probably be screaming fafo.

        • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Another brain washed CCP admirer from Xi’s $0.50 Army. The CCP murdered over 70 million people, who disagreed, since 1920 and the number continues to rise.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah! They had it coming! The police acted with the utmost restraint when they brought tanks to a protest, and America totally would have done worse than bringing tanks to a protest and totally would have ran protestors over with said tanks!!!

          • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Oh no he pulls out the image implying that the tank ran over a protester on the square!

            But he forgets that there is a video

            Of a man who blocks tanks driving away from the square… and… climbing on top of a military vehicle!!!

            What do you think would happen in America to someone who climbed on top of a tank and opened the hatch? And even still, he did not get shot but simply escorted away. Amazing.

            • Rin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              2 days ago

              He got carried away and never saw again you fucking brainlet

                • Godric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  he got carried away and was never seen again

                  Of course we don’t know his name, he got disappeared by a dictatorship. In a free country, we would know his name and he would be a powerful symbol of dissent against the government. Instead, he was erased as a human.

                  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    Never seen again means: nobody saw him again. This means you would know who it is. Which you do not. If the army wanted to run him over they would have simply run him over.