• brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t it against the Geneva convention regarding group or cruel punishment?

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fun fact: Geneva convention covers only war situations. Most violations are A-OK against your own citizens!

      • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Classic Hitler mistake.

        You can punish and gas and murder your own citizens by the literal train-load; just don’t try and do that in countries other than your own or eventually, many years later, after you’ve invaded half a dozen countries, someone will stop you.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s feudal lords vs peasants. We need a god damned traditional peasant revolt, I’m telling you.

            • tomiant@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You started this by letting the Puritans get away. You should have nipped that shit in the bud and we wouldn’t fucking have to deal with this shit right now.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s wildly incorrect. War crimes also apply to civil wars and any armed conflict at all.

        What usually comes up is the “tear gas is a war crime”, which has a special exception for domestic policing and riot control. It’s banned in war because the other side might respond with a much worse chemical weapon like sarin gas. That’s not a concern in a riot.