The number of questions on Stack Overflow fell by 78 percent in December 2025 compared to a year earlier. Developers are switching en masse to AI tools in their IDEs, making the popular developer forum increasingly irrelevant.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Beyond AI tools in IDEs, the reputation of the site’s attitude towards new question posters definitely doesn’t help. Neither does the site’s pivot towards AI that alienated a bunch of the power users. The reputation issue isn’t new though, and I’m not sure of when the AI pivot started.

    I’m also not sure if it’s a great metric. Personally, anything complicated enough for me to want outside help with is usually so far into the specifics of my work environment that it’s not safe to ask about online. It’d either be too revealing or devolve into the classic “I refuse to answer your question because I refuse to believe your starting scenario and limitations”. Otherwise it tends to be stuff I can sort out by piecing together stuff from blogs, documentation, and tangentially related stackOverflow answers. Not always easy, but easy enough that I’d rather work through it myself instead of asking the internet for help.

    • Feyd@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      the reputation of the site’s attitude towards new question posters

      Waaah I copy pasted my homework question and the expert that donates his time for free was mean to me

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, ok. Now explain these:

        • Closed as duplicate. Question is barely related to the supposed duplicate.
        • Ask question about library X. Get answers for library Y, with demeaning remarks about having used library X instead of library Y.
        • Newcomers have a solution. Can’t post it or even comment because minimum reputation requirements.
        • Accepted answer is wrong. The useful advice is in another answer or its comments.
        • Feyd@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          While I’m sure you can find examples of those, the reality is that mods are right the vast majority of the time. The truth people don’t want to acknowledge is that the strict moderation keeping up the quality of the answers is the reason stack overflow was so popular.

          • [deleted]@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Was so popular. Past tense.

            It was popular before the current ridiculous moderationlevels. Now people just go there for the older content, since all of the newer stuff gets closed as ‘duplicate’ despite not being a duplicate.

            • Feyd@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              That’s a ridiculous assertion. The moderation and complaints were the same a decade ago.