• tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not reading, but I’m curious to know what taking these two people public means

      • obvs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s kind of adorable to think that the economic fuckery is going to be something on the scale of any kind of recession.

        No, the economic fuckery that’s already happened is likely to cause another depression.

      • Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        We are already entering The Greatest Depression, this would just speed things along a bit.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would mean they would get rid of fixed rate mortgages - your repayment would vary with the fed reserve rate.

      “Public” doesn’t mean state-owned, it means issuing public shares, currently its a private company.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Taking them back to pre-2008 public holdings. I’m not educated enough to know if this is a good idea.

      FNMA was public for my whole life, since like 1969. FHLMC was public since like 1990 and people then thought it was a bad, bad idea but I guess it worked out OK until the whole crash. In 2008 they were both placed under the control of the Federal Gov’t. That seemed to work out OK for FNMA and FHLMC but I’m not sure how it affected everyone else.

      I really would suggest reading, it’s helpful.