The DA cited a lack of evidence as the reason for not charging him, but the article then goes on to detail that the allegations involve him making various female employees go on overseas trip with him and play the role of his wife (including sexual activity) in order to fool sex traffickers. Surely the DA could have interviewed all the women involved to verify the accusers’ testimonies, no? Makes the lack of evidence argument seem very flimsy.

Well, the victims should sue the hell out of him at any rate. He lost his job over this and they should try to financially ruin him.