• SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could very well be, but Hillary Clinton’s presidential run doesn’t provide evidence to that effect, since the majority of voters chose her.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      the majority of voters chose her.

      So what? The majority of people aren’t racists, that doesn’t mean that we don’t have racism. Sexism can exist and have measurable effects even if a female candidate gets more votes. The fact is, she didn’t get enough votes. That is in part because some voters wrote her off, believing a male candidate would be better because they were male. We know this is true because people have actually said that sex was a factor after casting their vote.

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Again, agree, but a woman candidate getting the most votes is just not good evidence of sexism. Al Gore also didn’t get enough votes.

          • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            This argument only seems to come up in the context of AOC running. It never seems to apply to all the MAGA women, or even right-wing Dems. And it seems very odd to argue that a woman can’t win votes due to sexism, and to cite as evidence a woman who won.