Goose is the only non-passerine emoji I have

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Prenups can have whatever in them. Common is for the poorer person to get nothing or a limited part of the other person’s wealth. Idea is to avoid giving away 50% of your shit if you’re rich. But there’s no set rules about what the terms can be.

    I’m assuming Dilbert guy just wanted to have at least 2 years worth of sex if he was gonna give her a bunch of money in a divorce.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh he must’ve known she wouldn’t stay for long. It’s all in him lol

        Why get married then is beyond me. He’s got money, could just pay for the girlfriend experience and have one high end girl on retainer for that.

        • burritosdontexist2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          He had already invested alots in this girlfriend and did not want to have to begin again with a new girlfriend. Opportunity cost is a serious thing. Is it more work (and alots I guess) to solve/bury the problem or to get a new partner and invest time and energy in them to get the same level of closeness?

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Aren’t there websites for rich dudes looking for women? I seem to remember reading about that. Why not just post on there that he’s the Dilbert guy and whatever his stipulations are. Someone would probably bite. He didn’t seem lile that gross of a dude other than his politics. I’d certainly be willing to over look some shit if a rich lady was willing to house me and pay for my all my shit. Unfortunately I’m not that attractive.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Tbf if there’s a 2 year “pension pre-nup”, I don’t think there was any closeness there. I’m fairly sure that whole thing was transactional from the get-go. Though I could be wrong of course.