Summary

Fable, a social media app focused on books, faced backlash for its AI-generated 2024 reading summaries containing offensive and biased commentary, like labeling a user a “diversity devotee” or urging another to “surface for the occasional white author.”

The feature, powered by OpenAI’s API, was intended to be playful and fun. However, some of the summaries took on an oddly combative tone, making inappropriate comments on users’ diversity and sexual orientation.

Fable apologized, disabled the feature, and removed other AI tools.

Critics argue the response was insufficient, highlighting broader issues of bias in generative AI and the need for better safeguards.

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You’re all over the place man. We are talking about an app that yes, is supposed to make jokes about everyone. The app is supposed to be “both siding” it.

    Your initial point was that if the app was supposed to be “roasting people” then it would mock anyone’s tastes. It’s pretty clear that no, it only makes racist, homophobic or disabled jokes. Thats not a “it roasts everyone equally” app.

    The company who makes the app agrees that it fucked up, as the article I linked showed;

    In an Instagram post this week, Chris Gallello, the head of product at Fable, addressed the problem of A.I.-generated summaries on the app, saying that Fable began receiving complaints about “very bigoted racist language, and that was shocking to us.”

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Your initial point was that if the app was supposed to be “roasting people” then it would mock anyone’s tastes.

      No that wasn’t my point, just that people with diverse taste got roasted. Clearly it didn’t work in the other direction, but that doesn’t meant the roasts that it did weren’t jokes or roasts.