It’s challenging to engage with articles quoting individuals who support crimes against humanity. Still, if we give some credit to Blinken’s statement that ‘China may have stopped Putin from using nuclear weapons,’ it prompts an interesting question: Could someone have encouraged Putin toward using such weapons? And if so, is it possible that figures like Blinken are not entirely disconnected from this eventuality?
Crimes against humanity are among the most serious offenses, second only to genocide. Someone capable of such crimes is hypothetically capable of all vices.
It’s challenging to engage with articles quoting individuals who support crimes against humanity. Still, if we give some credit to Blinken’s statement that ‘China may have stopped Putin from using nuclear weapons,’ it prompts an interesting question: Could someone have encouraged Putin toward using such weapons? And if so, is it possible that figures like Blinken are not entirely disconnected from this eventuality?
It’s not just that he supports crimes against humanity. It’s that he lies with every word while doing so.
That destroys his credibility for everything else.
Crimes against humanity are among the most serious offenses, second only to genocide. Someone capable of such crimes is hypothetically capable of all vices.