

This you?
https://lemmy.world/comment/14175411
Yeah, that’s you.
When you’re so fascist that Jordanlund recognizes you as fascist, most people are going to give you a hard time.
I really do love user tags.
This you?
https://lemmy.world/comment/14175411
Yeah, that’s you.
When you’re so fascist that Jordanlund recognizes you as fascist, most people are going to give you a hard time.
I really do love user tags.
He absolutely redefined to justify killing children. Bush didn’t do that. It was used, under Bush, to justify torture and jailing of adults.
Obama re-invented it for his purposes. The purpose being to kill children without consequence.
In my mind, that definitional change is significant enough that he owns a lot of that blame.
Fucking goddammit, he redefined the word to justify killing children. Why do you defend that?
EDIT: Removed indirect articles for easier readability, content is the same.
It was under Bush to justify imprisoning civilians. Bush was all for direct war actions.
Obama massively increased bombings and drone bombings to pull out combat troops and would do stuff like double tap weddings. To lower the number of civilian deaths, Obama declared any male over the age of 14 to be, by definition, an enemy combatant.
The person you responded to was correct, though a bit imprecise with their words.
You need to read more.