Plebbit is a selfhosted, opensource, nonprofit social media protocol, this project was created due to wanting to give control of communication and data back to the people.

Plebbit only hosts text. Images from google and other sites can be linked/embedded in posts. This fixes the issue of hosting any nefarious content.

it has no central server, database, HTTP endpoint or DNS - it is pure peer to peer. Unlike federated instances, which are regular websites that can get deplatformed at any time,

ENS domain are used to name communities.

Plebbit currently offers different UIs. Old reddit and new reddit, 4chan, and have a Blog. Plebbit intend to have an app, internet archive, wiki and twitter and Lemmy. Choice is important. The backend/communities are shared across clients.

The code is fully open source on

https://github.com/plebbit

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
    1·
    3 days ago

    No. From what I can tell, Plebbit works like this:

    1. User A generates public and private key, and registers a name with the DNS/ENS service to link the name to the public key
    2. User A controls the list of moderators, which have the power to delete posts and comments granted by the private key
    3. Other users create posts and comments with that public key, and User A later signs them with the private key to make them “official”

    If User A ends the service, moderation and signing of comments end, which effectively kills the community.

    My proposal works like this:

    1. users post to a topic (i.e. community)

    That’s it. Any moderation happens on the client. I have plans to make moderation largely automatic, so it’s not a pain while still hopefully controlling spam and trolls. Half the network could go down and the data would still largely be intact. In fact, a country could block internet entirely, and you could still sneakernet it in as long as someone has a relay there. If somehow all relays go down, you spin one up and everyone resyncs and we call it an outage. You can even host your own within your LAN.

    Domain names are convenient for relays, but they’re not essential. The only thing required is some way to connect peers.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1·
        3 days ago

        For who?

        • me? I can’t delete anything even if I wanted to
        • relay hosts? Most connections are short lived, and any data is end to end encrypted
        • cache maintainers? They can only delete local copies, so there’s no reason not to comply; they could even actively filter the data they store
        • individual users? There’s plausible deniability, which should protect the innocent, and local moderation should address the worst of it

        The biggest targets are individual users, but as we’ve seen with BitTorrent, that almost never happens. There’s also no profit here, so there are no assets to seize, though I’ll probably accept donations.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.comEnglish
          1·
          3 days ago

          I don’t mean crime, no. There’s laws regarding moderation when a platform is big enough. And regarding personal data in a lot of cases

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
            1·
            3 days ago

            Ah, that’s not a thing where I’m from (US). I wonder what that would look like without a central authority. There’s no way to guarantee any particular moderation or ensure deletion of personal data, so I guess their options are to ban it or let it slide.