return2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoGermany, other NATO allies sending troops to Greenland amid Trump threatswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square112linkfedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down15
arrow-up1513arrow-down1external-linkGermany, other NATO allies sending troops to Greenland amid Trump threatswww.newsweek.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square112linkfedilink
minus-squareFerrous@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 days ago Proven fake? Definitely not. Thats not how the burden of proof works. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days ago Ad Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise. “Fake” is itself an assertion requiring evidence, independent from stating neutrality, e.g., “We don’t know whether it is true or not.” Also, circular-reasoning fallacy: Who says they’re extraordinary claims within the context of what we already know?
minus-squareFerrous@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days ago Ad Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise. What does this even mean?
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoAh, and therein lies the problem ladies & gentlemen.
Thats not how the burden of proof works. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Ad Ignorantiam fallacy states otherwise.
“Fake” is itself an assertion requiring evidence, independent from stating neutrality, e.g., “We don’t know whether it is true or not.”
Also, circular-reasoning fallacy: Who says they’re extraordinary claims within the context of what we already know?
What does this even mean?
Ah, and therein lies the problem ladies & gentlemen.
Removed by mod