Because there’s a market for it, simple as that.
There’s also plenty of vegan products that don’t directly emulate meat-based foods. Also some foods were always flexible in their ingredients, and expecting meat is just personal and cultural bias.
And Kinderschokolade for not containing even 1% of meat from real children.
They are all very prominently labeled as vegan on the front and are located in an entirely different section of the supermarket.
If those hints couldn’t save you, maybe it’s okay that you tried to try a vegan alternative for once before reigniting this culture war issue over other people having options and sometimes being catered to as well.
Good on them. Fuck those military-cosplaying terrorists.
And those that aren’t openly and knowingly racist are still nationalist and authoritarian, of the “might makes right” variety in particular. You don’t thrive in that environment otherwise.
It sounds like a bad joke but they already do this with resisting arrest.
That works only for a subset of users able and willing to remember yet another PIN. Especially one they don’t need often.
The distinction may seem like nitpicking but no, CSAM is a legally defined term of depictions of actual children being sexually abused.
This game does not feature any such content. Not just because there are no depictions of real children, but also because the fictional children depicted aren’t subjected to sexual abuse.
Valve’s language cites “sexual conduct” which in this case reportedly (I didn’t watch it myself) has been stretched to include nudity that is non-sexual in nature.
I get why Valve would err on the side of caution, but that TOS decision is no basis to turn around and make the legally relevant claim that the game features actual CSAM.
Yeah this makes total sense if you never ever think about it.
Does it perhaps have the “remote control session” feature that Spotify has when logged in on multiple devices? I’ve ditched Spotify but am still looking for a platform with this feature.
So in short, this question could have been used in all sorts of ways to provide an answer that clarified the commenter’s position.
I mean, in the way it was asked not really. It was explicitly asked, or rather condescendingly demanded, as a simple binary choice stripped of all context.
That’s not how you engage with someone when you actually want to get their take on a complex issue. That’s how you engage if you want to score an easy win for upvotes. And I for one am done with that kinda hostile “debate bro” culture / popularity contest that’s defined many subreddits over the years. It shuts down any chance for an actual exchange. So let’s not act surprised at the result.
I know it’s a quote. So considering that nazis are a subset of fascists, what’s “LMAO” about saying that not all fascists are nazis? It is a simple logical conclusion of the first statement.
Yeah. So it is as I said, it seems you got the order mixed up here. This comment makes no sense otherwise.
Yeah it was asked in bad faith and framed in a manipulative way.
That’s not a good thing and should be called out, no matter if you disagree with the person it was directed at. It’s called integrity.
Yea and not all dogs are poodles. I think you got the order confused further up.
Yes, it’s a dogs vs poodles thing. Shouldn’t be so hard to understand.
The question itself was a cheap gotcha. Shockingly, it’s not as simple as that as I’ve been pointing out. Which you’d acknowledge if you were arguing in good faith.
It’s unfortunate that any attempt to insert some nuance automatically makes me the enemy in your simplistic position on the matter. And now ego prevents you from backing off of this kind of thinking by any means, no matter what toxic and regressive conclusions it takes you to.
I didn’t say the people of South Korea are being subjugated. Not sure how I could have made clearer that these are two separate issues.
You also won’t find me defending NK. Not everything should devolve into tribalism and dunking on whatever we perceive as the other team. Which is exactly what I’m criticizing about this question and the way it was asked.
So prosperity for one people is worth any price to you?
If you don’t know what to reply, then don’t. Seek out communities, posts, and comments about stuff you enjoy talking about. Especially when it’s a positive light.