Yes, but that was still Google’s choice. They could have done something for the user but they did not want to
Yes, but that was still Google’s choice. They could have done something for the user but they did not want to
No. Google did it this way so people would blame the EU. They also could just have added more choice to the interface but they rather wanted to remove it to show their users “how bad the EU is”.
Same thing with the cookie banners. EU said you should give your users the choice if they want to be tracked. And the companies build these ugly banners so everyone would blame the EU. But they could also just have stopped tracking their users.
To make it even more clear let me rephrase it:
If you want to store sth like that, it would be classified as functional and you wouldn’t even need a cookie banner for it.
Only if you want to use it to track people you need to notify them
Good thing then that Bundeskartellamt and Bundesnetzagentur are looking more closely at this now
Knowing Microsoft, breaking Firefox was probably intentional
That looks interesting. How did you implement the AI stuff? And is it possible to deactivate that?
I don’t think […]
Well, you think wrong: https://blogs.windows.com/windows-insider/2024/11/06/new-ai-experiences-for-paint-and-notepad-begin-rolling-out-to-windows-insiders/
I did at least explain what my vision is and why I wanted it which… doesn’t sound anything like Notepad, I think.
Might be, but the person you responded to wrote about windows putting AI into notepad, so everyone assumed you were responding to that and not writing about something that was not even mentioned
Then either you replied with your first post to the wrong post or you misread “windows putting AI into notepad” as notebookLLM? Because if not there is nothing obvious connecting your post to the parent
https://bsky.app/profile/stargazerbird.pmd.social/post/3ld4tz3hllc2u
Based of that, it sounds like it’s affect people who had opted into the boosted discovery since that was already a thing and that was 30%+. The simplified wording doesn’t help but I’m feeling this got way blown out of proportion. Humanity does that nowadays.
Everything can be a dating app /s
(this is sadly true)
That might also explain, why Gemini seems so lazy (/s)
I liked this image more: https://icosahedron.website/@halcy/113554477309412476
That’s also what they said about Dropbox: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
800.000 people?
Talking bullshit seems to pay very good
<edit> yes not everyone was paying, but still: </edit>
If accurate, the site at minimum would generate upwards of $5,650,000 every month.
It’s nice that you view it differently, but open source has a clear definition. And with this change it will not use a Open Source license anymore.
Yes, that might be your instance? I never had that problem. And I also think there are now some very good clients
What would you say makes threads better than the other mikroblogging services?
They are banning emulators but are then using them themselves. They are banning roms but are then using those same roms themselves.
Sounds like hypocrisy to me
I clicked for you:
I did ask which features were “unshipped” or removed but I did not hear back.
Ah, but there are still elections in other parts of the world, like Germany, where he is also very active