• 29 Posts
  • 598 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle











  • Not speaking for OP, but here’s what I wrote in another comment:

    But I would be squarely against closer political and monetary integration with the EU. We absolutely do not need the Euro or the Stability and Growth Pact, and we do not need the various Orbans, LePens and Melonis, or the various debt-phobic Germans and Dutch having any kind of veto over our policies or say over our politics. The Norwegian, Swiss and Icelandic models are good models of EU-collaboration, and we can of course develop our own. We can be very very very good friends, but just like we don’t need to be anyone’s 51st state, we also don’t need to be anyone’s 28th member state.


  • Excellent article.

    Main points for me:

    1. Horizon Europe, digital sovereignty and technology, GDPR. YES! And absolutely we should be strengthening our privacy laws. We should be moving towards GDPR and we should be pushing for right to repair, etc.

    2. Green Alliance, climate collaboration, and collaboration on the Arctic. YES! But see the impacts of CETA/ISDS/ICS too.

    3. Freedom of movement. Yes, but: Europe’s model of immigration has the opposite values than ours. We shouldn’t let European phobic attitudes to immigration hamstring us from developing further ties, e.g., with the north african and sub-saharan francophonie. But we should definitely, absolutely further develop Erasmus+ and other EU-Canada youth exchange programs. And it should become extremely fluid and frictionless to recognize European professional credentials in Canada. An Italian doctor or a Greek nurse or a Spanish engineer or a German tradesperson should be able to start practicing in Canada within weeks at worst. EDIT: Also, linked with deepening research collaboration: Canadian temporary permits (study, work) should start to be recognized as means to expedite or eliminate EU visitor visas. We welcome fantastic international students who come from places Europeans over-scrutinize (the Maghreb, Africa, Iran, India, …) and are in a disadvantage for research collaborations and/or research visits in the EU.

    4. But I would be squarely against closer political and monetary integration with the EU. We absolutely do not need the Euro or the Stability and Growth Pact, and we do not need the various Orbans, LePens and Melonis, or the various debt-phobic Germans and Dutch having any kind of veto over our policies or say over our politics. The Norwegian, Swiss and Icelandic models are good models of EU-collaboration, and we can of course develop our own. We can be very very very good friends, but just like we don’t need to be anyone’s 51st state, we also don’t need to be anyone’s 28th member state.

    Finally: for that matter, we should be looking for similar degrees of integration with Japan-Korea-Australia, etc. We are uniquely positioned to unite Pacific and Atlantic. To quote Carney: “if US no longer wants to lead, Canada will”.


  • I’m going to go against the anti-AI bandwagon here. Banning AI tools in a coding competition in 2025 is like banning calculators in an accounting competition.

    It’s a coding contest in a tech school. It’s ultimately about education. Guess what: these students will be using copilot when they get a job. The school should be preparing them about how to responsibly and safely use every tool available to them to be productive and professional.

    I would rather say that the organizers should have structured and scaffolded better the competition, so that tools like copilot could be part of the experience without compromising the overall learning objective.

    EDIT: I find it puzzling that many people downvoted this, but nobody bothered to answer.