lad

Oh, but that’s but a ten year long accident, nothing deliberate /s

… what?

I don’t get it, does it imply that there’s no way to tell a difference, or is there some other meaning?

This is an interesting article, but I think that this standardisation is exactly for port being the same, not for pinning specific implementation of the 600+ pages long standard.

Wow what a marketing scum trick to show all compatible older generations as separate products

Maybe a rat brain project? I think the mapping of human may take longer, but yeah, once it happens interesting times are on the horizon

I feel like you’re considering death penalty to be the default, but if the same logic is applied while considering lifetime in prison as the default, the result would be the opposite.

And considering that death of age looks to me more natural, I’m inclined to think no death penalty should be the default

Also, maybe in a world where you measure anyone with money it makes sense to measure intelligence with money ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A dog may be able to fully react and learn how to react with the exterior. But can it modify itself the way human brain can?

As per current psychology’s view, yes, even if to a smaller extent. There are problems with how we define conscience, and right now with LLMs most of the arguments are usually related to the Chinese room and philosophical zombie thought experiments, imo

I’d say that difference between nature boiling down to maths and LLMs boiling down to maths is that in LLMs it’s not the knowledge itself that is abstracted, it’s language. This makes it both more believable to us humans, because we’re wired to use language, and less suitable to actually achieve something, because it’s just language all the way down.

Would be nice if it gets us something in the long run, but I wouldn’t keep my hopes up

Judicial system working like this (including the previous comments about pleas) is something I would’ve probably doubted if I read it in a fiction, but here we are

I think it’s along the lines of ‘if the prosecution presented an accusation that is obviously false, how well standing is the rest of the case’

If I were in the jury, a case that is part bullshit would definitely compel me to think again about how well the investigation was done

Afaik, clients for Lemmy have tags, but they are stored on client side, too

PornHub falling victim to Kremlin is what I would call a mysterious chain of events

This makes me wonder why this community is there

Yeah, in case of polio and pox, there’s no question of if it will be beneficial

A good link, maybe image may be harmful even if it’s without context

So, you’re suggesting we make games per hour subscription? A good idea /s

Although you may be right about why they did it, I feel like imagery of gambling is not meant to be ‘something that is in any way related to something that happens to be gambling’, it’s when gambling is shown but you’re not the one gambling. If someone in game is gambling that’s imagery, if a game uses cards for something that is not gambling it’s not imagery.

Maybe winning a game award while being solo developer studio, it feels like this to me