• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle

  • I use Buckets . It’s a small 1 person freeware, dev asks for a 30 dollar one time donation but it isn’t mandatory. It’s based on the software and idealogy of ynab which enshittified several years ago. The learning resources of ynab should be mostly compatible but I haven’t looked at it in a while.

    It interopts with simplefin, an open source tool that reads your bank transactions and gives read only access to buckets. It costs 10dollars per year to use their servers. It creates some annoying quirks that is mostly the fault of my bank but its passable. The app can also take csv files if you would prefer (which most banks allow you to export).






  • It would be interesting to break down exactly why they have higher rates. It could be:

    • over reliance on it’s automated systems (but FSD is only enabled on a small percentage of cars)
    • safety design flaws (but it has a high safety rating by third parties)
    • Unconventional UX decisions (steering yoke, giant displays with no physical buttons etc)
    • novel behaviour of electric vehicles such as the fact users less familar with it’s acceleration behaviour and lack of gear shifts, the increased weight or one pedal driving. (but why aren’t other EVs up there)
    • The politicized nature of Tesla attracting more risky customers. (but is that really worse than the type of people buying ferraris and other performance cars?)

    The article points to the first point, and that certainly seems plausible, but they don’t really provide any evidence to support that.




  • It’s pretty hard to be open and transparent when 2 men with guns and black suits are sitting at your kitchen table.

    We don’t know if that happened, but given the speed this happened and the us being the us…

    If it breaks that they had a long runway of knowing this had to happen, then sure bring out the pitchforks, but imo we should default to this happening under heavy pressure to act immediately.




  • Health Canada guidance is a bit more nuanced

    Post-exposure prophylaxis or testing of a bat is generally recommended after direct contact with the bat (refer to Bat Exposure) because it is very difficult to ensure that a bite did not take place

    Bat exposure: Post-exposure rabies prophylaxis following bat contact is recommended when both of the following conditions apply:

    • There has been direct contact with a bat, AND
    • A bite, scratch, or saliva exposure into a wound or mucous membrane cannot be ruled out.

    Direct contact with a bat is defined as a bat touching or landing on a person.

    In a child, a bat landing on clothing could be considered a reason for intervention, as a history to rule out a bite, scratch or mucous membrane exposure may not be reliable.

    From 1998 to 2009, NACI recommended that people who may not be aware of or able to report a bat bite (e.g., sleeping person, young child, cognitively impaired) be offered intervention if a bat was found in the room with them. This recommendation was revised (as described above) in 2009 based on the rarity of human rabies related to bats (one case in Canada reported approximately every 5 years). Analysis conducted in Canada estimated that a case of human rabies related to bedroom exposure to a bat (i.e., finding a bat in the room of a sleeping person with no recognized physical contact with the bat) is expected to occur in Canada once every 84 years. In addition, it has been determined that, to prevent one case of rabies from bedroom exposure to a bat, using a conservative estimate, 314,000 people would need to be treated.