

Rushing to get the payout is not bad faith. That’s the terms of the contract.
Rushing to get the payout is not bad faith. That’s the terms of the contract.
When two parties sign a contract then they have to act in good faith. Preventing the other party from fulfilling their obligations to avoid a payout or invoke a penalty is not good faith. And that’s why the sea witch Ursula’s contract with the mermaid Ariel would not have held up in court.
Maybe the game would make more money during it’s life span if released later but that’s irrelevant when there’s a contract about how much money the game should make before a certain cut off date.
Dopaminergic neurons are more related to learning than feeling good.
There are some extra-synaptic neuro messenger molecules like enkephalin that reduce pain and increase feel-good but they hit opioid receptors and they are boring peptides so they don’t get TED talks.
Send them your dick pics. Either you are old enough or they are storing illegal material.
Hmm, adult incest games removed, no?
Gorgeous!
But to be honest I’ve never ever heard the fan from my playstation. Coil whine I do hear sometimes though. Which is pretty hard to fix. Power supply replacement?
Isn’t this game 25 years delayed?
So is the issue that Valve kicks you off the platform if you sell your game cheaper somewhere else? That does seem a little troublesome. I don’t think Apple or Sony has those restrictions? Apple takes 30% as well, right?
No, that’s what the income requirement is for. Are you telling me you would buy it even if they shipped a half-baked piece of shit product and all the reviewers told you so?
Edit: I think you are confusing your desire for a good game with the legal dispute