paw

I find it important that he writes, that freedom of individuals and markets is important because it is without coercion.

To then go on and write that he tried to coerce his editor to accept the change with a “hell yes” or basically resign. This is coercion. Doesn’t he see this? Is the irony lost on him?

tj devries had a similar take quite recently: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pmtuMJDjh5A&pp=ygUKdGogZGV2cmllcw%3D%3D

Pivot to AI is similar to web3 is going great. You could also look into Ed Zitron’s articles: https://www.wheresyoured.at/ however they are pretty rant-like but do also contain a lot of further links.

Out of interest, do you have any sources that what he does is not reliable? This is not some kind of I’m pissed off about your comnent, I’m actually not. Having said that, I see tgis as an opportunity to learn about Harris’ shortcomings. Thanks in advance.

According to Johnny Harris (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WYQxG4KEzvo) he does go into the details, according to Johnny’s sources. I can’t stand Elon as well, but I’m no longer sure if he’s just an investor.

As far as I understood, the robot taxis may start production by 2026 or 2027. Shouldn’t we live all on Mars by then, according to Musk?

/s

Additionally, if AI actually gives us this answer, tge answer we have already now, will we as a global society actualky implement it, because it sounds inconvenient (at least for some) or will we say, hey the AI seems to have made a mistake.

Besides streaming, i.e. the capability to watch the movies and series when you want and how much you want, and lowering the entry to produce videos for more people, they pretty much reinvented cable. Or did I miss something substantial?

Aw man, now I want this toaster.