Of course nobody has been arrested or charged. Manslaughter? Murder? Come on, at least reckless endangerment? Not if the victim is homeless and the perp is the state, fuck no.

Depends where. Not generally true.

Right, let’s build … public housing!

I generally agree with you, and I would also add that the DNC has been happy to go along with the Republican party to advance corporate interests.

It’s not like we didn’t know a lot of the tactics that the Republican party has employed for the last 30 years. These aren’t giant secrets, and they could be combated, except most Washington Democrats don’t want to, presumably because their corporate backers don’t want to.

Precisely. Harris enabled her opponent to win by having a weak stance on Israel. She handed him the keys to the White House, as the article clearly describes, by not standing up and speaking out against genocide.

No. They didn’t try to show her anything, because they don’t care about her ego. Why would they?

From an advertising perspective, it’s important to think about who you’re targeting. Who are your likely customers? Certainly there are some based on the strengths that you raised.

However, some people are definitely not a good target audience, and some people is actually a very large group of people. There are a lot of current and potential users who essentially want the standard major applications to work, and they’re not going to touch the root partition, and they want things to be very simple. For people like that, Debian or Ubuntu or Fedora already do what they want. And these major operating systems have been around for so long that people will naturally be more confident using them, because they were their friends have experience, or because they think the organization has more stability because of its experience.

Of course a lot of things depend on how you define words, but to me the above paragraph describes the mainstream audience, and I don’t think you’re going to have much luck reaching them, because I don’t think the thing you’re trying to sell gives them extra value. In other words, it’s not solving a problem for them, so why should they care.

Many sites work best with NoScript because the anti AdBlock is done by JavaScript.

(Of course that doesn’t always work, but when it does, great.)

Not the first. Remember Nixon?

You’re allowed to say it, even believe it. But your analysis is faulty. Please add a little context and youll see why. Trust to do what? Corrupt with what goals? It seems you have no idea…

Trump can fuck with NATO or not, but those countries have nukes. Western Europe is not Ukraine. His military leverage is lacking.

I don’t see the necessity to show that SB 14 is overbroad. The doctor only needs to establish that the drugs were reasonably (or arguably reasonably) prescribed for the claimed use, right? That is a much simpler goal.

Not true. Their hands were tied. Same with the prosecutors. This was their best.

The judge could try to give him jail time, but we all know that some appeals court would throw it out, and there’s a risk that they might also throw out the verdict with it. So it’s safer to go with an empty sentence.

What a f****** terrible way to write a headline. But at least the author is honest about their political views.

Who can say how the jury is going to decide, but I wouldn’t want to be in Google’s position. It’s easy to imagine a reasonable juror feeling exactly how the judge felt.

Wait a second. I understand the data on the first part, but shouldn’t the conclusion on the second part be rewritten? It sounds like work and congestion are hindering people having decent lives, by taking away all the time that they used to have to spend with friends or family or hobbies.

Based on the video, it was probably one single cop who fired all the shots. His or her name should be plastered all over the headlines as a murderer who hasn’t been arrested despite video evidence of the slaying.

Is the process reasonable? No, of course it’s not, because that’s the point. You can’t abuse citizens as much as you can abuse foreigners. If you don’t believe me, move to a different country and find out.

Have you been smoking, and can you share it with the rest of us?

Quite obviously, the Republicans have a coalition and the more fighting that happens within the coalition means the less legislation they can pass. That doesn’t mean life will get better, but it might mean that life gets worse more slowly.

Also, I’m confused. Which of the people you mentioned do you think are not racist or xenophobic? The people who want to get rid of all immigration because foreigners are evil criminals? The people who want to keep immigration because it’s a way for them to abuse their foreign laborers, who thinks that the Americans are too lazy or too stupid? It sounds like you think the former group is so bad that we should respect the latter group, and I really need whatever you’re smoking.